[registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated

[tbarrett]

Elana/Bruce,
 
As a followup from Gary's question:
 
If I read this correctly, losing registrars can no longer NACK a transfer if
a registrant does not respond to an email confirmation.  Correct?  
 
In other words, the transfer must be allowed by the losing registrar even if
the registrant ignores the confirmation request from the losing registrar.
 
Tom
 
 
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:58 PM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use
by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated


At 03:13 PM 10/9/03 +0100, Gary Boyd wrote:


But just so that I am clear. The losing registrar email is only designed to
be an alert to the registrant (thereby providing them with an opportunity to
block the transfer) and therefore the registrant is not required to
undertake any further action to complete the transfer process. 


Dear Gary:  There is a related element.  The Admin Contact may request and
authorize the transfer.  Notification of the registrant is a different
matter.  We have had cases where a hosting service, which was also the Admin
Contact, elected to order a transfer.  Subsequently, the registrant objected
and demanded that the domain be returned to PSI.

I think there could be a few cases like that in many bulk transfers of 500
to 1,00 [sic:  Sorry, 1,000] domains.

Regards, BobC



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/registrars/attachments/20031009/1cebcc81/attachment.html>