[registrars] FW: 2004 Nominating Committee - Invitation
Jean-Michel Becar
jmbecar at gmo.jp
Wed Apr 28 08:38:10 UTC 2004
Thomas,
Definitly what we need to do.
Thanks for makinf the point.
JMB
Thomas Keller wrote:
>I guess the point is that we choose someone who is known to fullfill the
>criterias listed under point one no matter whether he or she is a
>constituency member or not.
>
>1. Accomplished persons of integrity, objectivity, and intelligence, with
>reputations for sound judgment and open minds, and with experience and
>competence with collegial large group decision-making
>
>Last years representative Henning Grote might serve us as an excellent example
>for the selection of this years rep.
>
>Best,
>
>tom
>
>Am 28.04.2004 schrieb Jean-Michel Becar:
>
>
>>Dear Elana,
>>
>>I really appreciate this clarification and makes us clear how the
>>NomCom will be formed.
>>But still as this is not an ICANN requirement as mentioned by Theresa I
>>really don't see the point to follow it.
>>Would be very intersting to hear from other registrars their position
>>about that subject if they want to see somebody from the constituency or
>>not at the NomCom representing the Registrars.
>>
>>My personal point of view is that requirement should be an ICANN
>>requirement to avoid to have some constituencies with their participants
>>and other without..which will make the situation unfair.
>>I already know the registry constituency has already decided who they
>>will nominated and I can tell you he will be somebody working for a
>>registry.
>>So here we have 2 solutions: either to coordinate with all the
>>constituencies to make sure everybody follwo the same rule or we can
>>choose to do like some other constituency and to ignore this requirement.
>>
>>that was my 2 cents participation for today.
>>Regards,
>>Jean-Michel
>>
>>
>>Elana Broitman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Thank you to everyone who raised questions regarding the Nominating
>>>Committee Delegate. As you can see, I went to ICANN to clarify that
>>>point. Below is the clarification from Teresa Swinehart (thank you
>>>Teresa).
>>>
>>>I stand corrected regarding whether or not the delegate can work for a
>>>registrar. I would urge you to consider nominating someone who will
>>>clearly "be independent and not accountable, or beholden, to the
>>>constituency that selects them, or to any person, employer, or
>>>organization," while also having a good understanding of the ICANN
>>>dynamics and the registrar market.
>>>
>>>Remember that we must choose someone by May 11, so nominations must be
>>>made this week!
>>>
>>>Elana Broitman
>>>Register.com
>>>575 Eighth Avenue
>>>New York, NY 10018
>>>Phone (212) 798-9215
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>EFax (800) 886-2716
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Fax (212) 629-9309
>>>ebroitman at register.com
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Theresa Swinehart [mailto:swinehart at icann.org]
>>>Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 9:45 PM
>>>To: Elana Broitman
>>>Cc: Jean-Jacques TI/EM/PAR DAMLAMIAN; jeffrey at icann.org
>>>Subject: RE: 2004 Nominating Committee - Invitation
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Elana,
>>>
>>>Please find the following in response to your question on what is meant by
>>>the criterion # 4.
>>>
>>>ICANN expects the NomCom delegates to be independent and not accountable,
>>>or
>>>beholden, to the constituency that selects them, or to any person,
>>>employer,
>>>or organization. This was made clear to all the members of the 2003 NomCom
>>>members, but given that it was the inaugural NomCom, the constituencies
>>>themselves may not have understood this point.
>>>
>>>Criterion 4 addresses how the person selected is expected to behave, not
>>>who
>>>employs him/her or for whom he/she consults. Those selected by NomCom are
>>>selected in a NomCom group decision, through the development of consensus
>>>by
>>>delegates from all constituencies.
>>>
>>>Those involved in selecting the delegate may judge that the only way for a
>>>delegate to achieve this independence is by restricting
>>>employment/consultant status, but that restriction is not required by
>>>ICANN.
>>>
>>>The NomCom takes very seriously its responsibilities to require NomCom
>>>members to disclose actual and perceived conflicts of interest. See the
>>>posted Code of Ethics, and the Charge to the Subcommittee on Conflicts of
>>>Interest. http://www.icann.org/committees/nom-comm.htm The 2003 NomCom
>>>members disclosed their affiliations and disclosed actual or potentially
>>>perceived conflicts of interest to the Chair and Subcommittee on Conflicts
>>>of Interest. The Subcommittee determined how any disclosed conflicts or
>>>potential conflicts would be handled, including recusal from participation
>>>in discussion and voting. I hope this is helpful.
>>>
>>>Kind regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>Theresa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Elana Broitman [mailto:ebroitman at register.com]
>>>>Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 8:04 AM
>>>>To: swinehart at icann.org
>>>>Subject: FW: 2004 Nominating Committee - Invitation
>>>>
>>>>meant to copy you
>>>>
>>>>Elana Broitman
>>>>Register.com
>>>>575 Eighth Avenue
>>>>New York, NY 10018
>>>>Phone (212) 798-9215
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>EFax (800) 886-2716
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Fax (212) 629-9309
>>>>ebroitman at register.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Elana Broitman
>>>>Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 10:49 AM
>>>>To: 'jjd at francetelecom.com'
>>>>Subject: RE: 2004 Nominating Committee - Invitation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hi - how do we interpret criteria 4? are you seeking
>>>>individuals not directly working, consulting for, or
>>>>otherwise associated with any accredited registrar?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Elana Broitman
>>>>Register.com
>>>>575 Eighth Avenue
>>>>New York, NY 10018
>>>>Phone (212) 798-9215
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>EFax (800) 886-2716
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Fax (212) 629-9309
>>>>ebroitman at register.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: jjd at francetelecom.com [mailto:jjd at francetelecom.com]
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 10:09 PM
>>>>To: Elana Broitman
>>>>Subject: 2004 Nominating Committee - Invitation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Dear Elana,
>>>>
>>>>At its 6 March meeting in Rome the ICANN Board named me to
>>>>serve as Chair of the 2004 ICANN Nominating Committee
>>>>(NomCom). Shortly thereafter I selected Pindar Wong to serve
>>>>as Associate Chair. Working together, Pindar Wong, Linda
>>>>Wilson (Chair of the 2003 NomCom), and I have been preparing
>>>>for the work of the 2004 NomCom.
>>>>
>>>>The critical first step in this process is:
>>>>
>>>>* To invite the Supporting Organization
>>>>Councils/Constituencies and the Advisory Committees to name
>>>>their Delegate(s)/Liaison to the Nominating Committee in
>>>>accordance with the ICANN Bylaws. These responses are
>>>>requested as soon as possible and surely by 11 May 04.
>>>>
>>>>Attached to this letter is the specific request, with further
>>>>details about what information is needed, to whom the
>>>>responses should be sent, and to whom questions can be
>>>>directed. I will greatly appreciate your special attention to
>>>>the this request, so that the NomCom can begin its tasks
>>>>promptly. Please review carefully the attachments before
>>>>making a selection of Delegate(s)/Liaison.
>>>>
>>>>The NomCom will soon be posting further information on its
>>>>webpage on the ICANN website. We welcome your comments and
>>>>your assistance in recruiting candidates for these leadership
>>>>positions.
>>>>
>>>>I look forward to working with the Delegate[s]/Liaison you
>>>>name for this important undertaking.
>>>>
>>>>Yours truly,
>>>>Jean-Jacques Damlamian
>>>>JJD at francetelecom.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Gruss,
>
>tom
>
>(__)
>(OO)_____
>(oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of
> | |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger!
> w w w w
>
>
More information about the registrars
mailing list