[RSSAC Caucus] [Ext] Re: FOR REVIEW: RSSAC Statement on IANA's Proposal for Future Root Zone KSK Rollovers

[Andrew McConachie]

On Jan 9, 2020, at 00:46, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at icann.org<mailto:paul.hoffman at icann.org>> wrote:

I worry that, as written, there is ambiguity.  Is RSSAC requesting a single study that
would evaluate both alg roll and length change?  or separate studies?  Would a single study
on length change only satisfy the recommendation (since it says "or")?

The latter was what I intended, but I see where there is ambiguity. Better wording might be "... studying and documenting a comprehensive approach to an algorithm rollover, or to a key length change, …”

I’ve included this suggested text in the document.
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U1qKPRx9URRfiI4jijvLKSCS2W6upZRDppUsbANqIOg/edit?usp=sharing>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rssac-caucus/attachments/20200109/1f2dbd2c/attachment.html>