[Rt4-whois] Suggested updates for our agenda on Sunday

[Kathy Kleiman]

Hello Emily,
A much belated response that it is an excellent agenda, and I am so glad you were able to revise it for our big day today. Looking forward to our meeting with GAC, to our work ahead, and especially to seeing everyone in just a few minutes.
Best,
Kathy

From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:33 AM
To: rt4-whois at icann.org WHOIS
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested updates for our agenda on Sunday

Dear all

Thanks for all the work you have put in to making the public comment happen.  Reviewing the definitional work done by the subteams, I think it has been a job well done.  I'm looking forward to receiving comments through this process.

Thinking about Sunday's agenda - a couple of thoughts:

- We were unable to get an Art 29 speaker as originally planned
- The GAC has responded to our invitation for an outreach session, with a suggested time of 15:30-16:00
- Our discussions in our most recent call highlighted the need for us to spend some quality time as a group discussing what is meant by consumer trust, and revisiting what we are trying to do with our questionnaire.
- Given that our definitions are now out for public comment, I don't think we can really progress them until we've got some feedback from the community.

So, I'm attaching a redline of the agenda, and would appreciate any comments.  It looks worse than it is, because most of the changes are in fact re-ordering.  The main changes are to replace subteam definitions feedback/discussion with a session on consumer trust and the questionnaire, and to put in a session with GAC in the afternoon.

Please let me know what you think.

Kind regards


Emily
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110313/7c2d4362/attachment.html