[Rt4-whois] Comments on the Issues paper

[Omar Kaminski]

Dear Team,

My considerations are attached, using the same docx as Bill then James.

Have a great week,

Omar



2011/5/15 James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>
>
> Emily and Team:
>
> My comments are attached, appended to Bill's draft.  Most of these were composed somewhere over the N. Atlantic, so apologies if they don't make sense and/or need further explanation.
> Thanks--
> J.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Rt4-whois] Comments on the Issues paper
> From: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk>
> Date: Sun, May 15, 2011 9:13 am
> To: "rt4-whois at icann.org WHOIS" <rt4-whois at icann.org>
>
> Hi all
> A gentle reminder that we agreed to review the draft issues paper, and circulate comments by close of business on Monday. The Team has asked Alice to edit the comments, and we're hoping to set up a call on Wednesday with this as the only agenda item.
> So far, Kathy and Bill have circulated comments - thank you.
> Please let's have your comments by end of Monday.  If you're happy with the paper, or have views on the comments already made, please say so.
> Thanks
> Emily
> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
> telephone: 01865 582 811   mobile: 07540 049 322
> emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WHOIS Review - draft discussion paper REVISED wcs	JMB_and_OK_comments.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 39029 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110515/289bb99f/WHOISReview-draftdiscussionpaperREVISEDwcsJMB_and_OK_comments.docx