[Rt4-whois] some small suggestions regarding your draft Discussion Paper

[Omar Kaminski]

Dear Liz, Team,

I believe you pointed right about carefully (re)considering the "Cost
Impact & Considerations" section in terms of our scope of work.

Best,
Omar



2011/6/7 Liz Gasster <liz.gasster at icann.org>:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I am suggesting some very small edits to the “clarity of existing policy”
> section of your draft Discussion Paper on page 4, and to the first two
> questions on your list.  I think that the current language regarding
> consensus policies and the ICANN PDP may be slightly difficult for
> commenters to understand, and I hope to make the related questions clearer
> as well.
>
>
>
> I am sorry that I cannot participate on your upcoming call to answer
> questions but I am happy to explain further via email.
>
>
>
> Best regards, Liz
>
>
>
> Liz Gasster
>
> Senior Policy Counselor
>
> ICANN
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>
>