[Rt4-whois] Recommendations - here attached [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Kathy Kleiman]

Quick answers to Peter's question in text below
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>
> Thanks Kathy for circulating these versions - they're very helpful.
>
> The first thing I noticed was that the recommendation for a consumer portal seems to be missing. I assume this wasn't intentional?
==>  No, not intentional. Just in a different place. Does someone have 
easy access to the current text?
>
> The second relates to the privacy related recommendations, which I commented on earlier. On that issue, my comments and concerns remain.
==> Noted. Not sure how to resolve. Will leave this to Emily.
>
> I'll keep reading, but wanted to share my initial thoughts as soon as I could.
==> Tx you, and thank you for all the work on Chapters 7 and 8.
> Cheers
>
> Peter
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kathy Kleiman [mailto:kathy at kathykleiman.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 02:06 PM
> To: rt4-whois at icann.org<rt4-whois at icann.org>
> Subject: [Rt4-whois] Recommendations - here attached
>
> Hi All,
> To the Chapters 7 and 8 that Emily circulated today (an expansion of the
> Gap Analysis from one chapter into two to make it more readable), let me
> add Chapter 9, Recommendations.
>
> Chapter 9 is also separated out from the Gap Analysis to create a
> separate place for our Recommendations. The entire report leads up to
> them, and I guess they are the climax of our story.
>
> We worked hard to take our Dakar and MDR recommendations, remove
> duplicates, and clarify languages (so that all references are clear,
> etc.). There are still a few blanks to be filled in, so if you know the
> answers, please let the group know.
>
> Two copies attached:  a "clean" one, and one with the full set of edits
> shown.
>
> I'll be online for awhile, so please let me know if you can't read the
> files.
> Best,
> Kathy
>


--