[Rt4-whois] Fwd: Recommendations and general update

Wed Nov 30 16:03:49 UTC 2011

Many thanks, Lynn

For the latest version - we have the Consumer Trust chapter edited as
attached, and in place after Chapter 7 and before Chapter 8.  Highlighted
bits to be removed to an appendix.

Kind regards

Emily

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com>
Date: 30 November 2011 15:38
Subject: RE: [Rt4-whois] Recommendations and general update
To: Emily Taylor <emily at emilytaylor.eu>

don't worry - I got it.  Agree we can streamline it by moving details into
an appendix.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Recommendations and general update
From: Emily Taylor <emily at emilytaylor.eu>
Date: Wed, November 30, 2011 10:14 am
To: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com
Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org

Hi Lynn

Thanks for that on the order of the whole report.

Sorry, I wasn't very clear in what I was suggesting.  I'm not saying the
entire thing should go into an appendix.  Far from it.  I attach a mark up
showing my thoughts on what could go into an appendix, and some minor text
edits otherwise.

Please let me know what you think.

Kind regards

Emily

On 30 November 2011 14:20, <lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com> wrote:

>  Agreeable to putting the Consumer Trust chapter after Chapter 7- Law
> Enforcement.
> My feeling is that rather than an appendix for the Consumer Trust Chapter,
> we should just make appendicies of the two User Insight powerpoint slides.
> The slides are clear and lay out the same details.
>
> But I am reluctant to continue editing on my own working document and feel
> I should wait for your marked up version.
> I will also be happy to help Alice with administrative edits such as
> grammar, spelling, formatting and creating the Table of Contents.
> There was a section of content I removed because it looked like a Table of
> Contents to me.  It said here is how our paper is laid out.
> Lynn
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>
> Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Recommendations and general update
> From: Emily Taylor <emily at emilytaylor.eu>
> Date: Wed, November 30, 2011 8:00 am
> To: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com
> Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org
>
> Hi Lynn
>
> Delighted to have you online, and thanks for joining so early.  Please
> press on.  I'll be sending out a marked up version of the recommendations
> (showing the source - the best of my abilities) within the hour.
> The table of contents is excellent, and very helpful for the reader.
>
> Please would you take a careful look at the following:
>
> 1/ We discussed by e-mail last night the possibility of shifting some of
> the content from the Consumer Research chapter into an appendix. Could you
> have a look at this, and make suggestions?
> 2/ Please would you give careful thought to the positioning of the
> Consumer Trust chapter.  Peter, Kathy and I were thinking it would go very
> well after the Chapter 7 (what law enforcement want) and before our
> findings (Chapter 8 ) and recommendations (9).  I see that in your latest
> mark up you have the chapter where it originally was.  I think this not
> such a good position, because after it we immediately flip back into
> background stuff like the history of how the policy developed, what the
> compliance team does.  The consumer stuff I see as real meat and potatoes -
> good for the analysis section.  I would appreciate your thoughts on this
> Lynn.
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Emily
>
>  On 30 November 2011 12:20, <lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com> wrote:
>
>>  I'm back at my computer - my time zone is GMT -5 and it is morning here.
>> Not sure whether to do any further editing or not so will stand by and be
>> available to help.
>>
>> I did feel very encouraged that in just making administrative edits and
>> removing the yellow highlighting, it was easier to see the remaining points
>> of contention.
>>
>> Also felt that creating a Table of Contents is needed.
>> Happy to help in any way to move this forward.
>> Lynn
>>
>>
>>  -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [Rt4-whois] Recommendations and general update
>>  From: Emily Taylor <emily at emilytaylor.eu>
>> Date: Wed, November 30, 2011 4:41 am
>> To: rt4-whois at icann.org
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Thanks for your work overnight (or at least, my night).
>>
>> I'm trying to pull together the threads of the many e-mail messages that
>> have passed in the last 12 hours or so.
>>
>>
>> 1. Version control - this is proving a nightmare for everyone.  I am
>> sorry that so many of you have been struggling with this.  I can see that
>> we have had comments on the whole or part of the report from Bill, Susan,
>> Peter, Lynn.  I understand that Kathy was unable to see Bill's edits, so
>> rolled back to an earlier version.  There is also an incredibly annoying,
>> persistent "comment" that is repeated about 100 times randomly throughout
>> the document, and needs to be eliminated as it's confusing.
>>
>> *Action:  Alice, please would you circulate the latest copy of the
>> Report to the list as soon as possible, getting rid of highlighting except
>> where it indicates a major disagreement, and leaving in all the comments
>> from Bill, Susan, Peter and Lynn, but removing that buggy one.
>>
>> *2. Recommendations - Peter noticed that the ambit of the privacy
>> recommendations seems to have changed since Dakar, without an explanation
>> of how or why that change was made.  Clearly, this will tend to reduce
>> confidence, so my focus this morning will be to review and circulate a copy
>> of the recommendations.  I'm assisted in this by Kathy's work yesterday.
>> She and I have been puzzling over how to clean up/wordsmith/ etc the
>> recommendations, while respecting the negotiated text.  This is a very
>> difficult task.  There are also new recommendations on proxies, the one
>> from Lutz on common interface, and one which I put in about the Whois Data
>> Reminder Policy (from the compliance letter).
>>
>> *Action: I will review the latest draft recommendations, and compare
>> with the Dakar text.  I will circulate a clean and marked up copy, with the
>> latest versions of the recommendations, and an explanation for what has
>> changed and why.
>>
>> *3. Deadline.  I'm not prepared to give up yet!  This is our draft
>> report.  It is not our final version.  I will call it at 5pm UTC today.  I
>> want us to make every effort to get this out when we said we would. I
>> really believe we can do this.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Emily
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *
>> *
>>
>> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
>> t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
>> emily at emilytaylor.eu
>>
>> *www.etlaw.co.uk*
>>
>> Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
>> Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rt4-whois mailing list
>> Rt4-whois at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> *
> *
>
> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
> t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
> emily at emilytaylor.eu
>
> *www.etlaw.co.uk*
>
> Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
> Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.
>
>

-- 

*
*

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu

*www.etlaw.co.uk*

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.

-- 

*
*

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu

*www.etlaw.co.uk*

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111130/b07ab66e/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Consumer Trust Research Summary Clean Draft Nov28-1.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 56320 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111130/b07ab66e/ConsumerTrustResearchSummaryCleanDraftNov28-1.doc 