[Rt4-whois] Compliance chapter - draft [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Nettlefold, Peter Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au
Mon Apr 30 06:45:57 UTC 2012


Hi Emily,

Thanks for your comments.

Yes, I had seen it as an additional numbered sub-part to the recommendation.

Fyi, I'm just now reviewing the Executive Summary, and will circulate some comments shortly.

Cheers,

Peter



From: Emily Taylor [mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu]
Sent: Monday, 30 April 2012 4:42 PM
To: Nettlefold, Peter
Cc: <rt4-whois at icann.org>; Mikhail Yakushev; Smith, Bill
Subject: Re: Compliance chapter - draft [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Hi Peter

Thank you for your comments on the compliance chapter.  I fully support your proposed additional recommendation and look forward to feedback from others in the Review Team today.

This would be a separate recommendation numbered sub-point 3 in the current text, is that correct?

Kind regards

Emily

On 30 April 2012 04:14, Nettlefold, Peter <Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au<mailto:Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au>> wrote:

Hello all,



First, thanks very much Emily for taking the lead on drafting this chapter, which I fully support. This is a critical part of our report, and goes right to the heart of our earliest discussions, where we identified the 'missing regulator' in the system (noting the sensitivity about that specific term) as a key issue for us to focus on.



In conjunction with the strategic priority findings and recommendations, I think that this chapter covers the key concerns we have been grappling with in this area, at the same time as acknowledging and substantively responding to the comments we received from the community.



I have noted a few minor typos, and suggested one or two very minor wording changes, all in revision mode, but have nothing else to add to the text.



My one outstanding concern relates to the actual workflow systems and processes in place to support the compliance function. This is different to the staffing question, and the issues of structure and accountability, which we have already addressed. In short, it may be useful to explicitly say somewhere that the compliance team should have the tools it needs to do the job, particularly in light of the scaling issues associated with the new gTLD program. If others agree, we could supplement the existing recommendations with something along the lines of the below:



*       ICANN should provide all necessary resources to ensure that the compliance team has the processes and technological tools it needs to efficiently and pro-actively manage and scale its compliance activities. The review team notes that this will be particularly important in light of the new gTLD program, and all relevant compliance processes and tools should be reviewed and improved, and new tools developed where necessary, in advance of any new gTLDs becoming operational.



I look forward to comments on this issue.



Cheers,



Peter







-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Bill [mailto:bill.smith at paypal-inc.com<mailto:bill.smith at paypal-inc.com>]
Sent: Saturday, 28 April 2012 4:11 AM
To: Emily Taylor
Cc: Nettlefold, Peter; Smith, Bill; Mikhail Yakushev; <rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: Compliance chapter - draft



I have read the updated draft and support it in its entirety. Well done Emily and members of the team.



On Apr 27, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Emily Taylor wrote:



Hi there



As discussed on my call with Peter this morning, I attach a first draft of the new Chapter 4, complete with Findings and Recommendations.



I'm copying to the entire list so that you all have the opportunity to comment as soon as possible.  Please do read this.  It's core to our report.  I have no pride of authorship, please let me have your frank feedback.  There are some tracked changes at the end but really the whole thing is pretty new, so just read it through.  It's only 9 pages.



Can I have your final edits please by the end of Monday.



Kind regards



Emily





--





   [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/etclogo250x60.gif]







76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK

t: +44 (0)1865 582 811<tel:%2B44%20%280%291865%20582%20811> * m: +44 (0)7540 049 322<tel:%2B44%20%280%297540%20049%20322> emily at emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu%3cmailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu>>



www.etlaw.co.uk<http://www.etlaw.co.uk/<http://www.etlaw.co.uk%3chttp:/www.etlaw.co.uk/>>



Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.



<Compliance chapter (1).docx>



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.

This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate.
MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com<http://www.axway.com>.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



--


   [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/etclogo250x60.gif]


76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 * m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu>

www.etlaw.co.uk<http://www.etlaw.co.uk>

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
 and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
 review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
 intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all 
 copies of the original message. 

This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. 
MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120430/674df020/attachment.html 


More information about the Rt4-whois mailing list