[Rt4-whois] Request for redline version

[Smith, Bill]

I'm in favor of publishing a redline, provided it takes the form of a simple compare documents and save to PDF.

If anyone is interested, see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds/current/maillist.html , staring with the message posted by Jeff Hodges on 16 May.

From: Emily Taylor <emily at emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu>>
Date: Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:18 AM
To: "lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com<mailto:lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com>" <lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com<mailto:lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com>>
Cc: "rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>" <rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>>, "rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org>" <rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Request for redline version

Hi there

Just to be clear what I'm proposing, Lynn

I don't propose that we publish our working discussions, merely the differences between our two public documents.  This is similar to what was done by ICANN for the various versions of the gTLD applicant guidebook.  I found it very helpful because if you have read the whole document once, you can then concentrate on what has changed.

So, it's just highlighting differences in the two published texts.

Kind regards

Emily

On 17 May 2012 13:16, <lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com<mailto:lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com>> wrote:
If we have the discretion to decline this request, it seems like unnecessary work to me.
The principle that we have emphasized is that this is a consensus based output and we did work hard to achieve that.  and we have followed all the transparency practices as we progressed.
Lynn

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: Emily Taylor <emily at emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu>>
Sender: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 08:27:09
To: <rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>>
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Request for redline version

_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois





--


   [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/etclogo250x60.gif]



76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu>

www.etlaw.co.uk<http://www.etlaw.co.uk>

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.