[Rt4-whois] Request for redline version

[Seth M Reiss]

Can't Word and other programs just do this at a click of a computer key?

 

From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On
Behalf Of Lynn Goodendorf
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 3:01 AM
To: Emily Taylor; lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com
Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org; rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Request for redline version

 

Thanks for the clarification Emily.  

 

I still have a reluctance for ICANN staff to spend time on this but feel
reassured in that both

documents have been published.

Lynn

 

 

Ms. Lynn Goodendorf, CIPP, CISSP

VP - Data Privacy Services

VerSprite - Navigate Beyond Risk

(Main) 1.678.278.8312 | (Direct) 1.404.333.3779 | (Fax) 1.678.222.3401

www.versprite.com <http://www.versprite.com/>  |twitter: @VerSprite

 

  _____  

From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] on behalf of
Emily Taylor [emily at emilytaylor.eu]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 8:18 AM
To: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com
Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org; rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Request for redline version

Hi there 

 

Just to be clear what I'm proposing, Lynn 

 

I don't propose that we publish our working discussions, merely the
differences between our two public documents.  This is similar to what was
done by ICANN for the various versions of the gTLD applicant guidebook.  I
found it very helpful because if you have read the whole document once, you
can then concentrate on what has changed.

 

So, it's just highlighting differences in the two published texts.

 

Kind regards


Emily

On 17 May 2012 13:16, <lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com> wrote:

If we have the discretion to decline this request, it seems like unnecessary
work to me.
The principle that we have emphasized is that this is a consensus based
output and we did work hard to achieve that.  and we have followed all the
transparency practices as we progressed.
Lynn

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T


-----Original Message-----
From: Emily Taylor <emily at emilytaylor.eu>
Sender: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 08:27:09
To: <rt4-whois at icann.org>
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Request for redline version

_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois







 

-- 


     <http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/etclogo250x60.gif> 

 


76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 . m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu 

www.etlaw.co.uk

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120517/f343d498/attachment.html