[RZERC] [Ext] Re: openness and transparency

[Steve Sheng]

Thanks, Russ! noted.

So far there is support from Carlos, Peter, Howard, Kaveh and yourself on the following proposal from Jim:

“As a matter of routine, the RZERC publishes everything — meeting minutes, papers, mailing list traffic, transcripts, and recordings of meetings. Confidential or sensitive topics can be redacted as and when they arise. Executive sessions will be standalone events so they don’t get intermingled with routine RZERC business that can be freely published.”

Kim, Brad and Duane, your thoughts on this matter?

Best
Steve

From: Russ Mundy <mundy at tislabs.com>
Date: Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 12:07 PM
To: Kaveh Ranjbar <kaveh.ranjbar at board.icann.org>
Cc: Russ Mundy <mundy at tislabs.com>, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng at icann.org>, ICANN Root Zone Evolution Review Committee <rzerc at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [RZERC] [Ext] Re: openness and transparency



On Feb 14, 2017, at 5:45 AM, Kaveh Ranjbar <kaveh.ranjbar at board.icann.org<mailto:kaveh.ranjbar at board.icann.org>> wrote:

+1, I support this position.

All the best,
Kaveh.

On 09 Feb 2017, at 16:52, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng at icann.org<mailto:steve.sheng at icann.org>> wrote:

Thoughts from other RZERC members on this subject?

Sorry for not responding earlier (been down with a nasty bug for a while) but I also support the ‘fully open’ approach suggested by Jim.  Russ



_______________________________________________
RZERC mailing list
RZERC at icann.org<mailto:RZERC at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rzerc


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/rzerc/attachments/20170223/996f692e/attachment.html>