[RZERC] [Ext] Re: openness and transparency

[Steve Sheng]

Thanks, Kim! Noted. 

Best
Steve

On 2/23/17, 1:19 PM, "Kim Davies" <kim.davies at iana.org> wrote:

    Hi Steve,
    
    I fully support this level of transparency too.
    
    (I need to snap out of the default “IANA staff should not express opinions” mindset in here. ;)
    
    kim
    
    
    "rzerc-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Steve Sheng" <rzerc-bounces at icann.org on behalf of steve.sheng at icann.org> wrote:
    
        Thanks, Russ! noted. 
         
        So far there is support from Carlos, Peter, Howard, Kaveh and yourself on the following proposal from Jim:
        
         
        “As a matter of routine, the RZERC publishes everything — meeting minutes, papers, mailing list traffic, transcripts, and recordings of meetings. Confidential or sensitive topics
         can be redacted as and when they arise. Executive sessions will be standalone events so they don’t get intermingled with routine RZERC business that can be freely published.”
         
        Kim, Brad and Duane, your thoughts on this matter?
        
         
        Best
        Steve
         
        From:
        Russ Mundy <mundy at tislabs.com>
        Date: Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 12:07 PM
        To: Kaveh Ranjbar <kaveh.ranjbar at board.icann.org>
        Cc: Russ Mundy <mundy at tislabs.com>, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng at icann.org>, ICANN Root Zone Evolution Review Committee <rzerc at icann.org>
        Subject: Re: [RZERC] [Ext] Re: openness and transparency
        
         
        
         
        
         
        
        On Feb 14, 2017, at 5:45 AM, Kaveh Ranjbar <kaveh.ranjbar at board.icann.org> wrote:
        
         
        +1, I support this position. 
         
        
        All the best,
        
        Kaveh.
        
         
        
        
        On 09 Feb 2017, at 16:52, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng at icann.org> wrote:
        
         
        Thoughts from other RZERC members on this subject? 
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
         
        
        Sorry for not responding earlier (been down with a nasty bug for a while) but I also support the ‘fully open’ approach suggested by Jim.  Russ
        
        
        
        
        
         
        
        
        _______________________________________________
        RZERC mailing list
        RZERC at icann.org
        https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rzerc