[social-media-wg] Social-media-WG Digest, Vol 66, Issue 3

Alfredo Calderon calderon.alfredo at gmail.com
Thu Apr 29 11:58:29 UTC 2021


Dear colleagues:

On a first review of the draft plan, I do agree with the suggestion to exclude leaders from the Social Media WG and “some” in other leadership positions (tBD) from winning a prize in the competition. It is obvious that the purpose is to outreach and engage individuals from our community and reach out to newcomers to feel confortable sharing ideas (clear criteria's to be determined).

> 		
> Alfredo Calderon
> eLearning Consultant 
> calderon.alfredo at gmail.com |http://aprendizajedistancia.blogspot.com | Skype: Alfredo_1212| wiseintro.co/alfredocalderon
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Get your own email signature
>  


> On Apr 29, 2021, at 6:43 AM, social-media-wg-request at atlarge-lists.icann.org wrote:
> 
> Send Social-media-WG mailing list submissions to
>    social-media-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media-wg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    social-media-wg-request at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    social-media-wg-owner at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Social-media-WG digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re:  draft plan of ICANN71 At-Large Social Media    activities
>      (Natalia Filina)
>   2. Re:  draft plan of ICANN71 At-Large Social Media    activities
>      (Sarah Kiden)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:58:00 +0300
> From: Natalia Filina <filinafilka at gmail.com>
> To: social-media-wg <social-media-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [social-media-wg] draft plan of ICANN71 At-Large Social
>    Media    activities
> Message-ID:
>    <CAF_z5NWt=oJ+wrc_506ht7NX6pK_H6GMXv1eV8k78XmLgG+FAQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Dear  Social Media WG  team,
> I` d like to raise up the Q regarding our twitter competition (I put it as
> comment in Draft of SoMe activity plan):
> 
> My thoughts about the contest on Twitter: the last time we received
> comments about "again you win", and here is the conclusion:
> among the awarded persons should not be the Regional Chairs of the Social
> Media Group. because we make posts during the ICANN meeting. People make
> reposts of our posts. Our posts get a lot of likes this way. And we (the
> Regional Chairs) are the winners. This is not fair IMO.
> 
> I propose to exclude our names from the list of possible winners. Let the
> community members have a better chance.
> I also suggest that we announce the prize BEFORE the contest starts - it
> may be better motivation for all-)
> I also suggest that we prepare 3 prizes (I don't know, maybe it was like
> this before).
> 
> 
> I kindly ask you to comment on this.
> 
> And I kindly ask Staff to share with us plans about the prizes and the
> possibility of making them a little more regionally landed (as we discussed
> something related to the region of the rally- IMO a set of postcards of
> cities in the Netherlands would be fine -) - do we have such an opportunity?
> 
> 
> 
> Best,
> Natalia Filina
> 
> Moscow, Russia
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ??, 28 ???. 2021 ?. ? 01:20, Natalia Filina <filinafilka at gmail.com>:
> 
>> Dear Social Media WG team,
>> 
>> I suggest you look at the draft plan of ICANN71 At-Large Social Media
>> activities. There are things that we have done (and will repeat), but there
>> are also new tasks.
>> I ask you to make your comments, ideas and additions.
>> 
>> I will ask the staff to schedule our SMWG call after May 10, when we can
>> finally discuss the plan, changes and approve it for the start of the work.
>> 
>> Thank you in advance for your contribution!
>> 
>> 
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/14K70ZV-S74e_vV3toglBTok4cM1MvlXmuD80jntV6oo/edit
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> Natalia Filina
>> 
>> Secretary of EURALO
>> https://atlarge.icann.org/alses/euralo
>> 
>> Officer of SIG IoT (ISOC)
>> *http://iotsig.org/main <http://iotsig.org/main>*/
>> 
>> +7 906 722 54 61
>> Moscow, Russian Federation
>> 
>> 
>>> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/social-media-wg/attachments/20210429/6b8284cb/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:43:07 +0100
> From: Sarah Kiden <skiden at gmail.com>
> To: Natalia Filina <filinafilka at gmail.com>
> Cc: social-media-wg <social-media-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [social-media-wg] draft plan of ICANN71 At-Large Social
>    Media    activities
> Message-ID:
>    <CABKLyKi4H=ML_5TUD_PkFTTeXyLVU2f8ggJ_g+RbAysG9P5+MA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Dear Natalia,
> 
> Thank you for sharing the draft Social Media activities for ICANN71. Please
> adjust the document rights to 'suggest' to allow us to add comments.
> 
> Regarding the Twitter competition, I think as long as it is clear that the
> Regional Leads do not participate in selecting the winner, it would be
> okay. Personally, I have no problem with having a Regional Lead winning the
> competition but I agree that if it makes it look unfair, they can be
> removed from the competition.
> 
> I am in agreement about announcing the prize before and preparing 3 prizes.
> The question I have is if we want to maintain the Twitter competition as
> just the most likes/retweets or adjust it a little bit. During NASIG 2019
> (right before the ICANN66 meeting), the winner was selected based on the
> quality/content of tweets, engagement with external audiences, etc. I liked
> this approach.
> 
> Other than that, thank you to Lillian for chairing previously and to you
> for taking this on effortlessly.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Sarah
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:58 AM Natalia Filina via Social-media-WG <
>> social-media-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear  Social Media WG  team,
>> I` d like to raise up the Q regarding our twitter competition (I put it as
>> comment in Draft of SoMe activity plan):
>> 
>> My thoughts about the contest on Twitter: the last time we received
>> comments about "again you win", and here is the conclusion:
>> among the awarded persons should not be the Regional Chairs of the Social
>> Media Group. because we make posts during the ICANN meeting. People make
>> reposts of our posts. Our posts get a lot of likes this way. And we (the
>> Regional Chairs) are the winners. This is not fair IMO.
>> 
>> I propose to exclude our names from the list of possible winners. Let the
>> community members have a better chance.
>> I also suggest that we announce the prize BEFORE the contest starts - it
>> may be better motivation for all-)
>> I also suggest that we prepare 3 prizes (I don't know, maybe it was like
>> this before).
>> 
>> 
>> I kindly ask you to comment on this.
>> 
>> And I kindly ask Staff to share with us plans about the prizes and the
>> possibility of making them a little more regionally landed (as we discussed
>> something related to the region of the rally- IMO a set of postcards of
>> cities in the Netherlands would be fine -) - do we have such an opportunity?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> Natalia Filina
>> 
>> Moscow, Russia
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ??, 28 ???. 2021 ?. ? 01:20, Natalia Filina <filinafilka at gmail.com>:
>> 
>>> Dear Social Media WG team,
>>> 
>>> I suggest you look at the draft plan of ICANN71 At-Large Social Media
>>> activities. There are things that we have done (and will repeat), but there
>>> are also new tasks.
>>> I ask you to make your comments, ideas and additions.
>>> 
>>> I will ask the staff to schedule our SMWG call after May 10, when we can
>>> finally discuss the plan, changes and approve it for the start of the work.
>>> 
>>> Thank you in advance for your contribution!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/14K70ZV-S74e_vV3toglBTok4cM1MvlXmuD80jntV6oo/edit
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Natalia Filina
>>> 
>>> Secretary of EURALO
>>> https://atlarge.icann.org/alses/euralo
>>> 
>>> Officer of SIG IoT (ISOC)
>>> *http://iotsig.org/main <http://iotsig.org/main>*/
>>> 
>>> +7 906 722 54 61
>>> Moscow, Russian Federation
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>> Social-media-WG mailing list
>> Social-media-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media-wg
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
>> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
>> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/social-media-wg/attachments/20210429/ed55976a/attachment.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Social-media-WG mailing list
> Social-media-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media-wg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Social-media-WG Digest, Vol 66, Issue 3
> **********************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/social-media-wg/attachments/20210429/248b47f1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Social-media-WG mailing list