New home for time zone stuff by 2012?
D.Rhys-Jones at F5.com
Mon Aug 31 17:08:27 UTC 2009
Comments inline below.
>I believe ado was requesting offers and comments for a new home for the >time
>zone stuff. You and others may disagree with the UC idea while others may
>agree with it That is what an open discussion is all about.
You are absolutely correct, I hope I did not come off as sounding offensive. This was not intended.
>Yes, the current mechanism in the right hands (individual or consortium) >would
>continue to work. As I stated, I would prefer a single source of tzdata and
>not see this splintered into competing "standards". It would be good to >hear
>what ado thinks about the discussion and direction of this thread.
I agree wholeheartedly, I was just offering alternatives.
>BTW, your name categorization was needless additional commentary. Please >stay
>with the discussion thread without name innuendo.
This is an open discussion, of which I will stay within, however I will add comment if I notice interesting anomalies.
More information about the tz