[tz] Attempting to get speedier tz updates

[Todd Glassey]

On 10/21/2011 12:15 AM, Robert Elz wrote:
>      Date:        Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:16:11 +0100
>      From:        "Clive D.W. Feather"<clive at davros.org>
>      Message-ID:<20111020131611.GD27386 at davros.org>
>
> In a message that started out on another thread I don't want to
> get involved with ...
>
>    | While it would be nice if they sent us updates, we can't force them.
>
> That's true, but I kind of suspect, that we have never even asked.
Actually since I already have most of this list - we built it for our 
operations at USTiming.ORG we might be persuaded to provide a copy of 
the contact model to the TZ operations. What I would propose is the 
creation of a CONTACTS LIST I-D which I and our team can work with KRE 
and Group Management on the submission. It and a formal practice model 
for how to contact these parties would be appropriate for this endeavor 
and I will take responsibility for that as a deliverable if the group 
would allow that.

Todd

>
> I had been wondering about that, and considering doming something
> about it, for months now - and just possibly "considering" is all
> it would ever have been, however, perhaps we should attempt a little
> better than that.
>
> Attempting to contact everyone responsible, directly, would be a lot
> of work, just identifying the parties involved, so I thought it might
> be possible to take an easier route, and just ask the UN to do the
> contact work for us - that is, we write to the UN Secretary General,
> and ask that the message be redistributed to all member states - the
> message being a request that they ask whoever (whatever agency) is
> responsible for actually implementing time issues, to please inform us
> of any planned or actual changes - and perhaps, if they're able, any
> historical data they have.
>
> If people think this is a reasonable idea then I will implement it.
> Note: I don't much care if you expect it to actually succeed - if it fails,
> it has cost almost nothing, but if anyone can see an actual negative
> possibility from this, then I'd like to hear about it.
>
> Also, while I'm happy to draft (and circulate to the list before sending)
> the letter involved, it would probably be nice from the UN's viewpoint, if
> we could send in both English and French (and anything else?  I doubt we need
> to consider attempting all 6 official languages.)   That I cannot do,
> so I'd need assistance with translation into French (and anything else
> suggested as a good idea) - and that assistance needs to be from a fluent
> (native) speaker I believe, not someone who learned the language in school.
> Any volunteers?  (It won't be very long.)
>
> kre
>
>
>


-- 
Todd S. Glassey - CISM CIFI
CTO Certichron Inc

This message contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the intended recipient), you may not read, use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) thereto without retaining any copies.

Further we have a formal OPT OUT Policy posted on our website pertaining to the use of any Email Addresses gleaned or taken from any source, web, mailing lists, previous customer lists etc. In all instances we choose to formally OPT OUT and this notice constitutes formal disclosure that you may not collect, buy or sell or provide access to this email address or any pertaining to our DNS MX Record Publication License posted on the web at http://www-wp.certichron.com/?page_id=3947.