[tz] draft of change summary for next tz release
rra at stanford.edu
Tue Sep 17 23:10:24 UTC 2013
David Patte ₯ <dpatte at relativedata.com> writes:
> And some of us prefer having at least one zone for each ISO 3166-1
> country. Several of us understood the old theory file to require
> this. 1970 is an arbitrary computer geek cutoff point, with not much
> meaning to general time zone history.
None of these proposed changes make the database any better or worse in
this regard so far as I can tell.
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the tz