[tz] Pakistan DST in 2002

[Paul Eggert]

Tim Parenti wrote:
> Agreed.  I took a look through and there thankfully weren't too many cases like
> this.  In the attached patch 0001, I left the few cases where 00:01 is almost
> definitely correct, like the StJohns and Moncton rules; but removed the others.
> Feel free to apply it, or not, if people have strong feelings either way.

Let's leave those alone unless we get better data. The ":01"s are from Shanks, 
which although unreliable is better than nothing. Plausibly legislation 
specified 00:01 to avoid confusion about midnight transitions.

> The attached patch 0002 just rearranges NEWS items a bit, to be more consistent
> with future / past-and-future / past.

Thanks, I installed that into the experimental version.