[tz] [PROPOSED] Be more consistent about UT vs UTC
Philip Paeps
philip at trouble.is
Tue Nov 7 17:08:34 UTC 2017
On 2017-11-06 22:43:33 (-0800), Paul Eggert wrote:
>* NEWS, africa, asia, australasia, europe, localtime.c:
>* newctime.3, newtzset.3, northamerica, southamerica, theory.html:
>* tz-link.htm, tzselect.ksh, zdump.c, zic.8, zic.c:
>Be more consistent about using "UT" instead of "UTC" when talking
>about timestamps that might predate the introduction of UTC.
I wonder if it wouldn't be easier to simply note "where we write UTC, we
actually mean UT when referring to timestamps before UTC was
introduced".
While UTC is comparatively poorly understood, UT is simply unknown to
anyone who hasn't been reading tzdata diffs or hanging out with time
nerds for a while.
Also worth considering, where 'output' is concerned, people expect
"timezones" to be in the form of "UTC+-XXXXXX" and "UT" may be
confusing.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
More information about the tz
mailing list