[tz] [PROPOSED] Be more consistent about UT vs UTC
John Hawkinson
jhawk at MIT.EDU
Tue Nov 7 17:14:43 UTC 2017
When I read the patch, I found it confusing and it seemed like many of the changes would become harder to understand. I went back and reread Paul's front matter explaining the concern was timestamps prior to the existance of UTC. Then I threw away my composed message expressing concern.
So I think Philip's point is probably correct. This change seems like it creates more confusion, both in documentation and in strings printed by the code.
--jhawk at mit.edu
John Hawkinson
Philip Paeps <philip at trouble.is> wrote on Wed, 8 Nov 2017
at 01:08:34 +0800 in <20171107170834.GF13707 at rincewind.trouble.is>:
> I wonder if it wouldn't be easier to simply note "where we write UTC, we
> actually mean UT when referring to timestamps before UTC was
> introduced".
>
> While UTC is comparatively poorly understood, UT is simply unknown
> to anyone who hasn't been reading tzdata diffs or hanging out with
> time nerds for a while.
More information about the tz
mailing list