[tz] Java & Rearguard
kre at munnari.OZ.AU
Mon Jun 3 09:36:43 UTC 2019
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 17:19:22 -0700
From: Guy Harris <guy at alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <C6840C54-C178-497A-A254-CB736D983542 at alum.mit.edu>
| On May 31, 2019, at 3:49 PM, Paul Eggert <eggert at cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
| > On the contrary, IEEE Std 1003.1-1998 requires support for so-called "negative DST",
| Can we promote the term "Daylight Shifting Time"?
It would be more consistent with other such acronyms, and easier
to read, if it were "Shifted Daylight Time" (cf: ISO, UTC, ...)
But even better, just call it "the time" and be done with it. Having
two names (standard and **whatever**) implies that only two are possible
(and leads to the dumb assumptions that people tend to make).
When we need to refer to a specific time in a specific place, on a
specific date, we need all of that information to do it properly.
Allowing anyone to believe otherwise, ever, is to do them a great
disservice, even if in particular cases some of it ends up being
implied by other parts.
More information about the tz