[Wp4] Board comments on Annex 6

[Kavouss Arasteh]

    It would be best to engage the Board members on the CCWG to understand
better what scenarios they identified with the language.  (And I think it
would be good for us to give concrete examples of actual breach of human
rights within ICANN that we are concerned about - that can focus the
minds/conversation)
Paul +1
Kavouss


2015-12-19 15:28 GMT+01:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:

> On Dec 18, 2015 23:18, "Paul Twomey" <paul.twomey at argopacific.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > It would be best to engage the Board members on the CCWG to understand
> better what scenarios they identified with the language.  (And I think it
> would be good for us to give concrete examples of actual breach of human
> rights within ICANN that we are concerned about - that can focus the
> minds/conversation)
> >
>
> SO: +1 to that. The IAB's comment was mute (neutral) about this, don't
> know if the NRO-EC will be making comment on this subject as well.
>
> Regards
> > Paul Twomey
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/19/15 1:13 AM, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:
> >>
> >> It’s OK Niels, they also think that increased transparency is against
> the global public interest.  I infer that they think that the GPI is
> equivalent to whatever gives them the least amount of constraint and the
> greatest amount of obscured power.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To say I am disappointed in the Board is to understate the matter.
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Paul Rosenzweig
> >>
> >> Paul.rosenzweig at gmail.com
> >>
> >> +1 (202) 329-9650
> >>
> >> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
> >>
> >> Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
> >>
> >> Costa Rica: +506 7008 3964
> >>
> >> Our travel blog: www.paulandkatyexcellentadventure.blogspot.com
> >>
> >> My professional blog: www.paulrosenzweigesq.com
> >>
> >> Link to my PGP Key
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: wp4-bounces at icann.org [mailto:wp4-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf
> Of Niels ten Oever
> >> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 5:34 AM
> >> To: wp4 at icann.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Wp4] Board comments on Annex 6
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Pardon me. This time with attachment.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Niels
> >>
> >> On 18 December 2015 18:02:09 GMT+08:00, Niels ten Oever <
> lists at digitaldissidents.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dear all,
> >>>
> >>> By now you have probably all seen the comment of the board on the
> >>> proposed raft report, and especially annex 6. If not please find them
> >>> attached.
> >>>
> >>> I have to say I was both dismayed and struck by surprise when I read
> >>> the comments, but I am very curious to learn what you think.
> >>>
> >>> My main feeling was that we have already addressed all points that are
> >>> brought up, but again I am very curious to hear your opinion.
> >>>
> >>> Finally. The biggest surprise came from the suggestion of the use of
> >>> the public interest instrument, which seems to be quite far fetched to
> >>> use in case of human rights. !
> >>>
> >>>  I can
> >>>
> >>> imagine the headline: ICANN board
> >>> think human rights are against the public interest.
> >>>
> >>> Looking forward to hear what you all think.
> >>>
> >>> All the best,
> >>>
> >>> Niels
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> .
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wp4 mailing list
> >> Wp4 at icann.org
> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dr Paul Twomey
> > Managing Director
> > Argo P at cific
> >
> > US Cell: +1 310 279 2366
> > Aust M: +61 416 238 501
> >
> > www.argopacific.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wp4 mailing list
> > Wp4 at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp4/attachments/20151219/56448ead/attachment.html>