[Ws2-jurisdiction] Multiple Layers of Jurisdiction Document

[Vinay Kesari]

Hi Matthew and Kavouss, the decision arrived at during the meeting was to
draft a brief set of questions, aimed at a wider group of stakeholders. The
purpose would be to solicit factual input relevant to the issue we are
considering, ie. “The Influence of ICANN’s Existing Jurisdictions
(Governing Law and Venue) Relating to Resolution of Disputes”.

The intention isn't to open up either of the two documents for public input
or comment at this point, or ask for potential solutions. Hope that
clarifies.

Regards,
Vinay

On 22 November 2016 at 21:41, matthew shears <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:

> Hi Jorge, all
>
> I think it is to early.  I am uncomfortable with the idea of sending out
> the "influence" doc in particular as it contains a number of questions and
> hypotheses that would preferably be answered beforehand.  I do not believe
> a document should be circulated for comment and possible solutions when
> some of the issues raised in the document may not actually be problems at
> all.  This would be unnecessarily confusing.  Preferably these unknowns
> would be answered, resolved or discarded before the doc is circulated.
> Matthew
>
>
> On 21/11/2016 18:55, Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch wrote:
>
> Dear Greg and all
>
>
>
> As I see the situation and progress of this group, I feel that perhaps it
> is time to develop a community consultation on the basis of the two rough
> docs we have (multiple layers and the influence doc), requesting
> stakeholder input on their experience and opinions about the different
> issues we preliminarily have identified as a group in both docs (especially
> in the “influence” doc).
>
>
>
> This would allow us to assess where specific problems are, what the needs
> of the community are, and, possibly, also request some ideas on possible
> solutions to the problems identified.
>
>
>
> Perhaps it is still too early, but I think that in Hyderabad there was
> some agreement in the room that this fact-finding exercise could lead us to
> the next level in our discussions…
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *Von:* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-
> bounces at icann.org <ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org>] *Im Auftrag von *Greg
> Shatan
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 21. November 2016 19:48
> *An:* ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> *Betreff:* [Ws2-jurisdiction] Multiple Layers of Jurisdiction Document
>
>
>
> Here is the current state of this document.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing listWs2-jurisdiction at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
> --
> ------------
> Matthew Shears
> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)+ 44 771 2472987
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> [image: Avast logo]
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20161123/ebf10e6f/attachment.html>