[Ws2-jurisdiction] Multiple Layers of Jurisdiction Document

[Perez Galindo, Rafael]

Thank you Vinay.

That seems to be a reasonable way forward, which I support.

Best

Rafael


De: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] En nombre de Vinay Kesari
Enviado el: miércoles, 23 de noviembre de 2016 9:39
Para: matthew shears
CC: ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
Asunto: Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Multiple Layers of Jurisdiction Document

Hi Matthew and Kavouss, the decision arrived at during the meeting was to draft a brief set of questions, aimed at a wider group of stakeholders. The purpose would be to solicit factual input relevant to the issue we are considering, ie. “The Influence of ICANN’s Existing Jurisdictions (Governing Law and Venue) Relating to Resolution of Disputes”.

The intention isn't to open up either of the two documents for public input or comment at this point, or ask for potential solutions. Hope that clarifies.

Regards,
Vinay

On 22 November 2016 at 21:41, matthew shears <mshears at cdt.org<mailto:mshears at cdt.org>> wrote:

Hi Jorge, all

I think it is to early.  I am uncomfortable with the idea of sending out the "influence" doc in particular as it contains a number of questions and hypotheses that would preferably be answered beforehand.  I do not believe a document should be circulated for comment and possible solutions when some of the issues raised in the document may not actually be problems at all.  This would be unnecessarily confusing.  Preferably these unknowns would be answered, resolved or discarded before the doc is circulated.
Matthew

On 21/11/2016 18:55, Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch> wrote:
Dear Greg and all

As I see the situation and progress of this group, I feel that perhaps it is time to develop a community consultation on the basis of the two rough docs we have (multiple layers and the influence doc), requesting stakeholder input on their experience and opinions about the different issues we preliminarily have identified as a group in both docs (especially in the “influence” doc).

This would allow us to assess where specific problems are, what the needs of the community are, and, possibly, also request some ideas on possible solutions to the problems identified.

Perhaps it is still too early, but I think that in Hyderabad there was some agreement in the room that this fact-finding exercise could lead us to the next level in our discussions…

Best regards

Jorge

Von: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org<mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] Im Auftrag von Greg Shatan
Gesendet: Montag, 21. November 2016 19:48
An: ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org<mailto:ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
Betreff: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Multiple Layers of Jurisdiction Document

Here is the current state of this document.


_______________________________________________

Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list

Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org<mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction



--

------------

Matthew Shears

Global Internet Policy and Human Rights

Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)

+ 44 771 2472987<tel:%2B%2044%20771%202472987>

________________________________
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>

 <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>

_______________________________________________
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
 <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20161123/4a65396e/attachment.html>