[Ws2-jurisdiction] WRITTEN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RAISED DURING THE CALL

[Seun Ojedeji]

Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Aug 2, 2017 8:35 AM, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:

Seun

There's a difference between an informal briefing from a lawyer, and a
formal, written Opinion.


SO: Am clear on that. However does that mean informal briefing can't be
written down (with appropriate disclaimer included if necessary)?


Informal briefings can, to some extent, skate over the detail and
technicalities (though I wouldn't expect them to miss the important points).


SO: This is all that I believe is important for now. We should get informal
response to all the "unique" questions raised and then look at which of the
responses require/warrants more formal response.

Regards


A written opinion, however, must be carefully considered, and must be
comprehensive. That is to say, many billable hours = costly.

Now, it really is worth doing this where there is a specific, well drawn
"qualified question" to be answered.

But a widely drawn brief is a recipe for a result that is

(a) confusing additionally or alternatively confused; and
(b) extremely expensive.

I'm as keen as Kavouss and Paul to have a briefing on how ICANN-PTI's
obligations have changed since transition, both in law (I suspect not at
all ) and de facto (which clearly has changed, from changes in the way
existing policy is being interpreted).

But let's have focus.



On 02/08/17 07:10, Seun Ojedeji wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I was not on the call and have not had to bandwidth to look at the
> recordings. If this is about Sam's response to the questions Greg was
> asking us to provide.
>
> Then I think the ideal thing is to document the responses side by side
> with the questions.
>
> A verbal response whether captioned or not should not be applicable
> after all the responses must have been documented somewhere before it
> was being read out by Sam, so why not just share the document and let's
> end this seemingly trivial matter.
>
> Regards
> Sent from my mobile
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> On Aug 2, 2017 4:45 AM, "avri doria" <avri at apc.org
> <mailto:avri at apc.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     With captioning, don't we already have an equivalent to written
> answers?
>
>     avri
>
>
>
>     On 01-Aug-17 15:55, Greg Shatan wrote:
>     > Kavouss,
>     >
>     > Kindly direct your request to the Subgroup, and not to Sam.  This is
> a
>     > matter for the Subgroup to consider, rather than any individual
>     > participant.  The Subgroup can take up your request and decide
> whether
>     > to ask for written responses to questions (and if so, which
>     > questions).  Thank you.
>     >
>     > Best regards,
>     >
>     > Greg
>     >
>     > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Kavouss Arasteh
>     > <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>     <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>
>     <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Dear Sam, With tks to your presentation, pls kindly note that I
>     >     nned written answers to the questions raised before the meeting
>     >     and those during the meeing either as intervention or in the
> chat.
>     >     Regards
>     >     Kavouss
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>     > Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
>     > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>     <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction>
>
>
>     ---
>     This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>     https://www.avast.com/antivirus <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>     Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>     <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
> _______________________________________________
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170802/237f122a/attachment.html>