[Ws2-jurisdiction] RES: RES: RES: ISSUE - unilateral jurisdiction of one country over ICANN

[Nigel Roberts]

I don't understand what your point is, apart from painting me as a 
perfectionist (I'm actually quite the opposite, but it's not a bad thing 
to say about me).

It's really simply.

If this WG ends up proposing that ICANN acquires any form of immunity 
from suit for any of its acts, or their consequences I, and a number of 
others (OUTSIDE the US) will strongly oppose that.



On 21/08/17 12:19, Arasteh wrote:
> DearAll
> Some of our respectful and distinguished colleagues may be perfectionist
> to the extent that they wish to ignore all constructive and possible
> solutions
> They raise questions and questions to every suggestions rather than
> complementing solutions to address their concerns
> I am sorry to be so transparent and open with advance apology
> Kavouss
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 21 Aug 2017, at 13:08, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net
> <mailto:parminder at itforchange.net>> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Monday 21 August 2017 04:29 PM, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>>> And what will ICANN then be immune from?
>>
>> Milton put it nicely, to quote, "...from the vagaries of U.S. foreign
>> policy or other laws and policies that would circumvent ICANN’s
>> accountability to its global MS community."
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>>> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>