[Ws2-jurisdiction] Revised Questions for ICANN Legal

[Mathieu Weill]

Thanks Greg,



I expect that ICANN legal might ask us some clarifying questions about the 
question, but it would be good to engage in this dialogue.



As a demonstration that we also did our homework on the issue, it might be 
worth noting that the ICANN litigation documents 
(https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/litigation-en) web page 
mentions :

-          Several cases of litigations in US States out of California

-          One case of litigation outside of the US only (the Pool.com case 
(https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/litigation-en which never 
lead to a formal court order, but within which ICANN seems to have argued 
against the choice of jurisdiction. I should also note that ICANN’s 
arguments were related to the specific circumstances of the case, and not 
necessarily applicable to other potential cases)



Best

Mathieu



De : ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org 
[mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] De la part de Greg Shatan
Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2017 04:58
À : ws2-jurisdiction
Objet : [Ws2-jurisdiction] Revised Questions for ICANN Legal



All,



Here is a revised version of the questions for ICANN legal, with the 
previous changes accepted and new changes based on our last call shown in 
track changes.



Please reply if you have any questions or comments, or if you believe these 
are now ready to forward to the CCWG's legal committee.



Thanks!



Greg

Greg Shatan
C: 917-816-6428
S: gsshatan
Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
 <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com> gregshatanipc at gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170221/4c01a14f/attachment.html>