[Ws2-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction Questionnaire: Next Steps

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hello Greg,

I do think the announcement route will be most appropriate. Option 1 is
definitely out of it, option 2 may be used but my preference would be
through announcement and people should just pick the questions via the
subgroup wiki page. That way people will also know it's a subgroup work,
directly access logs of the sub-group activities and perhaps membership
sign-ups to the group can also happen ;-)

As to mode of presenting the questions, I would suggest presenting 2
options to the responder; submission via a form and submission via a
document upload. Just similar to how we received public comments during WS1
as CWG-stewardship.

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On 19 Jan 2017 07:04, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> As you probably know by now, the Questionnaire was approved without
> objection by the CCWG Plenary.  A copy of the final version is attached.
>
> We now need to work on the next steps of publishing and announcing the
> Questionnaire.
>
> The time period the questionnaire will be open is under discussion in a
> different thread in the CCWG-Accountability mailing list.  I urge you to
> contribute to that discussion.
>
> The method of publication of the Questionnaire needs to be finalized, as
> does the method (or methods) of submission of responses.
>
> Method:
>
> The Questionnaire could be published on a webpage of the ICANN site in
> text and  submissions could be made by email (with the response either in
> email text or in attachments).
>
> Alternatively, the Questionnaire could be published as a survey, using
> www.surveymonkey.com or Google Forms or some other application.
> Survey/form inputs can help the process of aggregating the answers (e.g.,
> Google Forms puts the answers on a spreadsheet).  However, since the
> answers will be free text fields and links, and could include documentary
> attachments, a survey form may not be ideal.
>
> If we publish the Questionnaire on the ICANN website, the next question is
> where and how will it be published?
>
> 1.  One possibility is the ICANN Public Comment page.  The Public Comment
> page found at https://www.icann.org/public-comments describes Public
> Comments as follows:
>
> Public Comment is a vital element in ICANN's decision-making process
> whereby the community is given an opportunity to comment upon proposals
> initiated by a working group or staff department.
>
> This is not a Public Comment, since we are not asking for comment on a
> proposal. It might be misleading to announce the questionnaire on the
> Public Comment page and to publish it on a page formatted like a Public
> Comment and under the public comment taxonomy.  The Public Comment pages
> contain a lot of additional explanatory text that is not appropriate here.
>
> 2.  Another possibility is to announce the questionnaire on the IANA
> Stewardship & Accountability home page at https://www.icann.org/
> stewardship-accountability.  This page is in the home page menu on
> https://www.icann.org/ (as is the Public Comment page).  The
> questionnaire can then be published under the stewardship-accountability
> taxonomy, and simply present the Questionnaire without other text.
>
> There may be other possibilities.
>
> Regardless, the Questionnaire can be publicized through the usual ICANN
> methods (e.g., News and Announcements on home page and News page (
> https://www.icann.org/news), ICANN Daily Digest, annouincements sent to
> SOAC contacts, etc.)
>
> Please reply with any comments you may have.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Greg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170119/daecf4bc/attachment.html>