[Ws2-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction Questionnaire: Next Steps

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Greg,
One possible way would be , depending on the suggestions and comments made,
you prepare a working doc. for discussion at our tomorrow's evening, Geneva
Time , and further proceed.
However, the 60 days commenting period is mandatory and shall not be end
before 31 March 2017, in order to allow those SO/AC like GAC , THAT THEY
NEED A PHYSICAL MEETING TO DISCUSS AND DEBATE THE QUESTIONAIRES and having
15 days after ICANN/GAC 58( 31 March ,as a deadline to reply.

2017-01-19 7:27 GMT+01:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:

> Hello Greg,
>
> I do think the announcement route will be most appropriate. Option 1 is
> definitely out of it, option 2 may be used but my preference would be
> through announcement and people should just pick the questions via the
> subgroup wiki page. That way people will also know it's a subgroup work,
> directly access logs of the sub-group activities and perhaps membership
> sign-ups to the group can also happen ;-)
>
> As to mode of presenting the questions, I would suggest presenting 2
> options to the responder; submission via a form and submission via a
> document upload. Just similar to how we received public comments during WS1
> as CWG-stewardship.
>
> Regards
>
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> On 19 Jan 2017 07:04, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> As you probably know by now, the Questionnaire was approved without
>> objection by the CCWG Plenary.  A copy of the final version is attached.
>>
>> We now need to work on the next steps of publishing and announcing the
>> Questionnaire.
>>
>> The time period the questionnaire will be open is under discussion in a
>> different thread in the CCWG-Accountability mailing list.  I urge you to
>> contribute to that discussion.
>>
>> The method of publication of the Questionnaire needs to be finalized, as
>> does the method (or methods) of submission of responses.
>>
>> Method:
>>
>> The Questionnaire could be published on a webpage of the ICANN site in
>> text and  submissions could be made by email (with the response either in
>> email text or in attachments).
>>
>> Alternatively, the Questionnaire could be published as a survey, using
>> www.surveymonkey.com or Google Forms or some other application.
>> Survey/form inputs can help the process of aggregating the answers (e.g.,
>> Google Forms puts the answers on a spreadsheet).  However, since the
>> answers will be free text fields and links, and could include documentary
>> attachments, a survey form may not be ideal.
>>
>> If we publish the Questionnaire on the ICANN website, the next question
>> is where and how will it be published?
>>
>> 1.  One possibility is the ICANN Public Comment page.  The Public Comment
>> page found at https://www.icann.org/public-comments describes Public
>> Comments as follows:
>>
>> Public Comment is a vital element in ICANN's decision-making process
>> whereby the community is given an opportunity to comment upon proposals
>> initiated by a working group or staff department.
>>
>> This is not a Public Comment, since we are not asking for comment on a
>> proposal. It might be misleading to announce the questionnaire on the
>> Public Comment page and to publish it on a page formatted like a Public
>> Comment and under the public comment taxonomy.  The Public Comment pages
>> contain a lot of additional explanatory text that is not appropriate here.
>>
>> 2.  Another possibility is to announce the questionnaire on the IANA
>> Stewardship & Accountability home page at https://www.icann.org/stewa
>> rdship-accountability.  This page is in the home page menu on
>> https://www.icann.org/ (as is the Public Comment page).  The
>> questionnaire can then be published under the stewardship-accountability
>> taxonomy, and simply present the Questionnaire without other text.
>>
>> There may be other possibilities.
>>
>> Regardless, the Questionnaire can be publicized through the usual ICANN
>> methods (e.g., News and Announcements on home page and News page (
>> https://www.icann.org/news), ICANN Daily Digest, annouincements sent to
>> SOAC contacts, etc.)
>>
>> Please reply with any comments you may have.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Greg
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170119/6f3a6a2b/attachment-0001.html>