[Ws2-jurisdiction] Two litigation reviews

[Mathieu Weill]

Thanks David, excellent work as usual.



Given the outstanding public attention given to this case, and the level
of discomfort it created in many ICANN circles, including this group, I
would find it appropriate to note the “non-legal” impact. To remain as
fact-based as possible, we could mention something like :

“As a result of the litigation (and the previous IRP), the .africa
application (as one instance of implementation of ICANN’s policy) suffered
significant delay.”



Best

Mathieu



De : ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] De la part de McAuley, David
Envoyé : mardi 28 février 2017 15:20
À : ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
Objet : [Ws2-jurisdiction] Two litigation reviews



Seeing Mathieu’s mail just now reminded me that I was to send my
litigation reviews (2 so far) to list.



Attached are two reviews in one document – DCA v. ICANN (Trial court) and
DCA v. ICANN (Appellate Court).



Best regards

David



David McAuley

International Policy Manager

Verisign Inc.

703-948-4154



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170301/0f50de84/attachment.html>