[Ws2-jurisdiction] ICANN litigation review in the case entitled KARL AUERBACH v. ICANN

[Paul Rosenzweig]

This is very good information Avri.  Thank you.  It reflects what is, in my opinion, the single real issue underlying the jurisdiction of incorporation -- that is, how the place of incorporation impacts corporate governance disputes.

I would suggest that one question that derives from this (and should be asked of any alternate proposal) is how this dispute would have turned out if ICANN were incorporated in another jurisdiction.  Would the results have been the same? What would have been a likely timeline for reaching the result?  Etc.  I realize that such questions are speculative -- but that is the nature of much of the question about alternate jurisdictions

Paul

Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
www.redbranchconsulting.com
My PGP Key: https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684

-----Original Message-----
From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of avri doria
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 1:01 AM
To: ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
Subject: [Ws2-jurisdiction] ICANN litigation review in the case entitled KARL AUERBACH v. ICANN

A litigation review.

avri




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus