[Ws2-jurisdiction] Questionnaire analysis

[Arasteh]

Dear All
I fully agree with the two points raised by Thiago,in particular, devoting more time to analysis done by Christopher  on responses  given by net coalition while inviting  them to attend the call if they so decide
Regards
Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone

> On 25 May 2017, at 18:21, Thiago Braz Jardim Oliveira <thiago.jardim at itamaraty.gov.br> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
>  
> As I understand it, there were no objections in our last call to offering respondents an opportunity to respond to questionnaire/comments' analysis. Can I ask you how we are going to proceed on this? There have already been two calls in which comments were examined and perhaps we should start calling on their authors to participate in our next calls, should they wish.
>  
> On a related point, our last call lingered on for perhaps too long in a discussion about the subgroup's mandate (mea culpa), and when the time came for an analysis of Just Net Coalition's questionnaire, not only we were left with little time for a more in-depth debate in response to the analysis provided by CW, but also the group was not actually provided with much of the substance of Just Net Coalition's questionnaire. Greg himself noticed that. So what I suggest is for us to come back to that questionnaire as we give Just Net Coalition, and I'm hoping they will accept it, the opportunity to comment on it.
>  
> Best,
>  
> Thiago Jardim
>  
>  
>  
> Thiago Braz Jardim Oliveira
> Divisão da Sociedade da Informação
> Ministério das Relações Exteriores
> +55 61 2030 6389
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170525/ca226c54/attachment-0001.html>