[Ws2-jurisdiction] Further actions on my latest MODIFIED /Softened SUGGESTIONS

[Kavouss Arasteh]

 Greg
In addition to the elements of my last proposal that you have  included in
the last version you have posted quite recently , I have had other
proposal  which I did ask you to look at them and include them either in
the itroduction ,as relevant, or preamble to the Recommendation . See below

Greg
*1.The last sentence reads” unless the results of the study demonstrate
that it would be inappropriate for ICANN to pursue these licenses.”To this
effect the first sentensce below “ what Criteria……inappropriate Because you
qualify the study by being inappropriate and I did suggest what criteria
will be use to make the judgement *
*Thus the first sentence would fir .You may include my comment by modifying
the sentence as follows *
*UNLESS ,USING APPROPRIATE CRITERIA, THE RESULTS OF STUDY DEMONSTRATE THAT
IT WOULD BE INAPPROPRIATE FOR ICANN TO PURSUE THESE STUDIES*.
This has been covered in part



2.

*Generally, ICANN  should pursue the application for general license at
arliest time and should  remind the registries not to copy and paste the
general agreements found in US-based registrars. *

*This also fits*

 This has been covered in part

3. The role of ICANN, to make awareness about such situation is critical
and should not be undermined.
*This part is talking about awareness that was extensively discussed and
thus fits *
This has been covered in part

*4. There are several reports in the media that US-Based and Non-US
registrars have asked registrants to transfer out their domains immediately
because they might get affected by US sanctions*
*This could be included in appropriate part .if it does not fit with the
recommends part *
This has NOT been covered in part
*5.Examples of that are related to Godaddy and Online Nic, which made
pressure against registrants having citizenship of Sanction coountries.
This could be included in the introductory part of the OFAC sanctions and
registrar*
This has NOT been covered in part
*6 Registrars  should be reminded that they should not normally examine
zero risk policy in regard of penalties imposed by OFAC.*
*This could be included either in the recommends part or preamble of the
recommend part *
This seems not covered.
Pls kindly advise about those which are not covered in any part of the
report or if covered , I have nor seen it
I am grateful to you for that guidance
Regards
Kavouss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170921/babf9905/attachment.html>