[Ws2-jurisdiction] Fwd: PLEASE REVIEW: Almost Final Draft Report for Review before Submission to Plenary on 2 March

[Raphaël BEAUREGARD-LACROIX]

Dear all,

Would it be possible to keep both the first (generic) statement *and *the
second, more specific one? While it is slightly repetitive, the second can
serve as an example to the first.

Best,



2018-03-01 15:40 GMT+01:00 <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>:

> Dear Greg and all,
>
>
>
> If I understand your email below correctly, and consistent with what was
> agreed yesterday, you are consulting the list on the latest text that
> Thiago proposed on note 4.1, i.e. the following addition, right?:
>
>
>
> “The late suggestion added to the report that “Further Discussions of
> Jurisdiction-Related Concerns” are needed, in particular on jurisdictional
> immunities, found echo in several comments subsequently received, but these
> comments did not bring any changes to the report, nor could they be
> considered in detail, on the understanding that the existing support for
> “further discussions” to address unresolved concerns, including in other
> fora, had already been acknowledged”
>
>
>
> As said yesterday I have no objections to such an addition.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Ws2-jurisdiction [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] *Im
> Auftrag von *Greg Shatan
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 1. März 2018 00:22
> *An:* ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
> *Betreff:* [Ws2-jurisdiction] Fwd: PLEASE REVIEW: Almost Final Draft
> Report for Review before Submission to Plenary on 2 March
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> Attached in Word and PDF is the almost final Draft Report, based on
> today’s call.  This is also available in Google Docs at
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rdMJyvZdyN9TApT6gx_
> 3NwpdvIL7YKHEUD7tNfLf6hU/edit?usp=sharing.
>
>
>
> Please review and comment.  I have marked in the margin the sections
> corresponding to the “Notes” in the chart distributed before today’s call.
>
>
>
> In particular please review and respond to the suggested text on page 12
> at the end of the “Overview of the Work of the Subgroup.”  There are two
> proposed additions that grew out of Note 4.1.  The first received broad
> support on the call without noted objections.
>
>
>
> The second received both support and objections on the call.  Since there
> was no clear path forward from the call, it is important that as many
> participants as possible give this careful consideration and provide their
> views on this second proposed addition.  This text reads as follows:
>
>
>
> The late suggestion added to the report that “Further Discussions of
> Jurisdiction-Related Concerns” are needed, in particular on jurisdictional
> immunities, found echo in several comments subsequently received, but these
> comments did not bring any changes to the report, nor could they be
> considered in detail, on the understanding that the existing support for
> “further discussions” to address unresolved concerns, including in other
> fora, had already been acknowledged.
>
>
>
> I look forward to hearing from you all, with regard to the report as a
> whole and any specific aspects, in particular the proposed text above.
>
>
>
> Since the final draft must be submitted no later than 23:59 UTC on 2
> March, I am setting *a deadline of 18:00 UTC on 2 March* for all
> responses.
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> This message is being sent from a Law Firm and may contain CONFIDENTIAL or
> PRIVILEGED information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not
> print, copy or distribute this message or any attachments. Advise the
> sender immediately by reply e-mail, and delete this message and attachments
> without retaining a copy.
>
> *Disclaimer*
>
> The information contained in this communication from the sender is
> confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others
> authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in
> relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
> be unlawful.
>
> This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been
> automatically archived by *Mimecast Ltd*, an innovator in Software as a
> Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a *safer* and *more useful* place
> for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and
> compliance. To find out more Click Here
> <http://www.mimecast.com/products/>.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>


-- 
Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix
LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rapha%C3%ABl-beauregard-lacroix-88733786/> -
@rbl0012 <https://twitter.com/rbl0112>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20180301/2cf50cb6/attachment-0001.html>