[Ws2-jurisdiction] Almost Final Draft Report for Review before Submission to Plenary on 2 March

[Bernard Turcotte]

All,

Simply a reminder that there is now less than 24 hours to the Friday 2
March 1800 UTC deadline for submitting comments.

Bernard Turcotte
ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Raphaël BEAUREGARD-LACROIX <
raphael.beauregardlacroix at sciencespo.fr> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Would it be possible to keep both the first (generic) statement *and *the
> second, more specific one? While it is slightly repetitive, the second can
> serve as an example to the first.
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> 2018-03-01 15:40 GMT+01:00 <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>:
>
>> Dear Greg and all,
>>
>>
>>
>> If I understand your email below correctly, and consistent with what was
>> agreed yesterday, you are consulting the list on the latest text that
>> Thiago proposed on note 4.1, i.e. the following addition, right?:
>>
>>
>>
>> “The late suggestion added to the report that “Further Discussions of
>> Jurisdiction-Related Concerns” are needed, in particular on jurisdictional
>> immunities, found echo in several comments subsequently received, but these
>> comments did not bring any changes to the report, nor could they be
>> considered in detail, on the understanding that the existing support for
>> “further discussions” to address unresolved concerns, including in other
>> fora, had already been acknowledged”
>>
>>
>>
>> As said yesterday I have no objections to such an addition.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Von:* Ws2-jurisdiction [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] *Im
>> Auftrag von *Greg Shatan
>> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 1. März 2018 00:22
>> *An:* ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
>> *Betreff:* [Ws2-jurisdiction] Fwd: PLEASE REVIEW: Almost Final Draft
>> Report for Review before Submission to Plenary on 2 March
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>>
>> Attached in Word and PDF is the almost final Draft Report, based on
>> today’s call.  This is also available in Google Docs at
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rdMJyvZdyN9TApT6gx_3Nwpd
>> vIL7YKHEUD7tNfLf6hU/edit?usp=sharing.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please review and comment.  I have marked in the margin the sections
>> corresponding to the “Notes” in the chart distributed before today’s call.
>>
>>
>>
>> In particular please review and respond to the suggested text on page 12
>> at the end of the “Overview of the Work of the Subgroup.”  There are two
>> proposed additions that grew out of Note 4.1.  The first received broad
>> support on the call without noted objections.
>>
>>
>>
>> The second received both support and objections on the call.  Since there
>> was no clear path forward from the call, it is important that as many
>> participants as possible give this careful consideration and provide their
>> views on this second proposed addition.  This text reads as follows:
>>
>>
>>
>> The late suggestion added to the report that “Further Discussions of
>> Jurisdiction-Related Concerns” are needed, in particular on jurisdictional
>> immunities, found echo in several comments subsequently received, but these
>> comments did not bring any changes to the report, nor could they be
>> considered in detail, on the understanding that the existing support for
>> “further discussions” to address unresolved concerns, including in other
>> fora, had already been acknowledged.
>>
>>
>>
>> I look forward to hearing from you all, with regard to the report as a
>> whole and any specific aspects, in particular the proposed text above.
>>
>>
>>
>> Since the final draft must be submitted no later than 23:59 UTC on 2
>> March, I am setting *a deadline of 18:00 UTC on 2 March* for all
>> responses.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>>
>> Greg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> This message is being sent from a Law Firm and may contain CONFIDENTIAL
>> or PRIVILEGED information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not
>> print, copy or distribute this message or any attachments. Advise the
>> sender immediately by reply e-mail, and delete this message and attachments
>> without retaining a copy.
>>
>> *Disclaimer*
>>
>> The information contained in this communication from the sender is
>> confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others
>> authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby
>> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in
>> relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
>> be unlawful.
>>
>> This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been
>> automatically archived by *Mimecast Ltd*, an innovator in Software as a
>> Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a *safer* and *more useful* place
>> for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and
>> compliance. To find out more Click Here
>> <http://www.mimecast.com/products/>.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix
> LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rapha%C3%ABl-beauregard-lacroix-88733786/> -
> @rbl0012 <https://twitter.com/rbl0112>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20180301/09e3f807/attachment.html>