[CCWG-ACCT] Quality of our proposal will suffer from this pace that leaves no time for consideration and meaningful evaluation

[James M. Bladel]

Agree Keith.  October is looking very unlikely, but we can¹t go too deep
in to 2016 either.  I expect an extension, but no more than 4-6 months.

J.


On 4/14/15, 6:30 , "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:

>Eberhard,
>
>I believe the contract WILL be extended.
>
>I agree content and getting accountability right is paramount.
>
>I also believe there is a limited window of opportunity to secure a
>transition.
>
>Keith
>
>
>
>
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Apr 14, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.NA> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>> 
>> It is a FUNDAMENTAL issue, are we approaching this right or wrong?
>> 
>> I think we did this wrong right from the start, and are doing this
>> wrong. If we are getting this wrong, a transition would not achieve what
>> we all want.
>> 
>> There is no deadline which would make the transition fail, they will
>> just extend the contract.
>> 
>> We must not sacrifice content, under ANY circumstances.
>> 
>> el
>> 
>> 
>>> On 2015-04-14 13:39, Drazek, Keith wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I am strongly in support of getting accountability reforms
>>> "right," but I'm also sensitive to a possibly limited window of
>>> opportunity to secure a transition of IANA stewardship.
>> [...]
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
>> el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
>> PO Box 8421             \     /
>> Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community