[CCWG-ACCT] Quality of our proposal will suffer from this pace that leaves no time for consideration and meaningful evaluation
James M. Bladel
jbladel at godaddy.com
Tue Apr 14 13:43:13 UTC 2015
Agree Keith. October is looking very unlikely, but we can¹t go too deep
in to 2016 either. I expect an extension, but no more than 4-6 months.
On 4/14/15, 6:30 , "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:
>I believe the contract WILL be extended.
>I agree content and getting accountability right is paramount.
>I also believe there is a limited window of opportunity to secure a
>Sent from my iPhone
>> On Apr 14, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.NA> wrote:
>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>> It is a FUNDAMENTAL issue, are we approaching this right or wrong?
>> I think we did this wrong right from the start, and are doing this
>> wrong. If we are getting this wrong, a transition would not achieve what
>> we all want.
>> There is no deadline which would make the transition fail, they will
>> just extend the contract.
>> We must not sacrifice content, under ANY circumstances.
>>> On 2015-04-14 13:39, Drazek, Keith wrote:
>>> I am strongly in support of getting accountability reforms
>>> "right," but I'm also sensitive to a possibly limited window of
>>> opportunity to secure a transition of IANA stewardship.
>> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
>> el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
>> PO Box 8421 \ /
>> Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community