[CCWG-ACCT] Proposed text to add to public comment document
gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Thu Apr 30 04:56:01 UTC 2015
Could we add at the end "as a opposed to a multilateral solution."?
On Thursday, April 30, 2015, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> I have a real problem with this.
> There is no doubt that the private sector has been a major and influential
> component since its inception, but it is similarly true that governments
> and users (albeit in varying models) have been an integral component of
> ICANN. Our roles may be different, but our roots go as deep, and the import
> of the public interest in ICANN cannot and should not be swept under the
> At 28/04/2015 08:05 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
> As requested in our call today, below is proposed text for various parts
> of the draft public comment document.
> *Section 22.214.171.124 *p. 54 add to end of (f):
> "It is therefore more closely aligned with the existing structure of ICANN *and
> in keeping ICANN rooted in the private sector*."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community