[CCWG-ACCT] [WP1] Revised draft - Voting weights in community mechanism
jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Wed Jul 29 19:26:05 UTC 2015
I too think this is a very important question and would like to understand
what policies are in the bylaws.
It seems to me that policies are NOT bylaws material. Quite the opposite.
Policies are the living body of work that ICANN is about. The bylaws are
about the frameworks within which policy is made.
That said I am still one of the newer participants in this environment,
and so wonder if there is some part of the bylaws I am missing.
On 30 July 2015 at 01:52, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> wrote:
> Thank you Chris, that's very useful and I can understand.
> However that veto on the "extremely narrow band of global policies for
> ccTLDs" would only be possible if the policy also implied a Bylaw change.
> Did that ever happen or is that even conceivable ? IDN ccTLD Fast track or
> Framework of Interpretation did not I believe.
> You have more experience than me on that.
> Le 29/07/2015 14:38, Chris Disspain a écrit :
> Well, here I am prepared to express an opinion. The ccNSO policy by-law is
> clearly written and sets out the basis upon which ccNSO policy can be dealt
> with by the Board. There is a requirement for the ccNSO to involve the
> other relevant ICANN bodies in its policy making. The idea that the
> extremely narrow band of global policies for ccTLDs that may be undertaken
> by the ccNSO in accordance with the carefully crafted and politically
> balanced methodologies that have been created could, in essence, be blocked
> by other SOs and ACs is totally unacceptable to auDA and I suspect would be
> unacceptable to a number of my ccTLD colleagues.
+64-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob)
Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz
*A better world through a better Internet *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community