[AT-Review] latest version of recommendations

Chris Disspain ceo at auda.org.au
Thu Dec 16 19:39:28 UTC 2010


Brian, All,

 

I will work on WG 1 section on Sunday and get proposed changes out. I am
unlikely to be on the call on Monday.

 

Cheers,

 

Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer

.au Domain Administration Ltd

 <tel:1300%20732%20929> T: 1300 732 929 |  <tel:03%208341%204112> F: 03
8341 4112

E: ceo at auda.org.au | W: <http://www.auda.org.au/> www.auda.org.au

 

auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator

 

 

Important Notice - This email may contain information which is
confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the
use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient,
you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have
received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this
message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this
email.

 

From: Brian Cute [mailto:bcute at afilias.info] 
Sent: Friday, 17 December 2010 06:31
To: 'Fiona Alexander'; 'Chris Disspain'; at-review at icann.org
Cc: 'james.bladel'
Subject: RE: [AT-Review] latest version of recommendations

 

Thanks Fiona.  I will integrate these edits into the next version that is
circulate.   PLEASE NOTE that the numbering for recommendations has been
and will be changed in the final report.  The numbering will be consistent
between the enumerated recommendations as they appear in the Executive
Summary and in the body of the report.  I will make sure that Larry's
priority recommendations correlate and are accurately identified in the
new numbering scheme.

 

To the extent that authors of the other WG sections of the report (other
than the edits to WG 2) have similar edits to make, please do so in
advance of our call on Monday and I will integrate them for discussion on
our call.

 

Regards,

Brian

 

From: Fiona Alexander [mailto:FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 2:24 PM
To: 'Chris Disspain'; at-review at icann.org
Cc: 'james.bladel'
Subject: Re: [AT-Review] latest version of recommendations

 

Enclosed please find edits to the WG 2 report for inclusion in the final
document.  The edits fix a couple of typos and include a new section on
the reaction to the WG 2 related draft recommendations in the comment
process and Cartagena sessions.  Please review carefully.

 

The WG 2 recommendations are just a cut and paste of those contained in
Chris' document so they should be the same.  Note that that recommendation
13 should also include the sentiment that the length of the GAC-Board
meetings should be increased not just the frequency (i.e., the idea that a
one hour session at each of the three yearly meetings is not sufficient).
In this WG 2 document that is recommendation #5 and the word "longer" has
been added.

 

Lastly the findings and recommendations have been separated into two
distinct sections given the upfront summary of recommendations.  Again,
please read carefully to ensure it is coherent.

 

In terms of  prioritization and implementation, Larry has the following
recommendation:

 

-          There should be a new section added near the front that makes
the following points:

o   Presumption that all recommendations will be implemented;

o   Only reason not to is some conclusion by the Board that the
recommendation cannot be implemented or would be unreasonably
expensive/time consuming to implement;

o   The Board should provide a status report on all recommendations by the
March meeting in San Francisco;

o   A final report by the Board should be provided in June that describes:
1) what recommendations have been fully implemented; 2) the status and
schedule for completing/implementing the remaining recommendations; and,
3) the identification of recommendations the Board has concluded it cannot
implement including a detailed explanation as to why the recommendation(s)
cannot be implemented.

 

Consistent with the request from the Board that it would be helpful for
the ATRT to prioritize the recommendations, Larry's priorities are 10, 12,
17, 18, and 19.  Please note, I'm working on the assumption that these are
the numbers corresponding to the recommendations as put out for public
comment in Oct, not the version Chris sent yesterday.

 

Fiona

 

 

From: at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org] On
Behalf Of Chris Disspain
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:27 PM
To: at-review at icann.org
Cc: 'james.bladel'
Subject: [AT-Review] latest version of recommendations

 

All,

 

Greetings from Washington DC where Brian and I have re-drafted the
recommendations to take account of our discussions in Cartagena.

 

They are attached. Please note that Warren may have some additional
suggestions re section D and Larry possibly a note of two re section B.

 

Outstanding tasks - 

 

Brian will provide a redrafted Exec Summary and annexes including our
observations on the process and a note about how we handled comments.

 

Cheers, 

 

 

Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer

.au Domain Administration Ltd

 <tel:1300%20732%20929> T: 1300 732 929 |  <tel:03%208341%204112> F: 03
8341 4112

E: ceo at auda.org.au | W: <http://www.auda.org.au/> www.auda.org.au

 

auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator

 

 

Important Notice - This email may contain information which is
confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the
use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient,
you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have
received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this
message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this
email.

 



__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 5705 (20101215) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20101217/628a3587/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the AT-Review mailing list