[atrt2] Meeting in Beijing

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Fri Feb 22 23:25:07 UTC 2013


Thanks for starting the conversation.

I agree with the reasoning and can live with any of the options.
My preference is for (d).

I like the idea of getting a day in before, i.e. bracketing the ICANN meeting with our meeting. 


On 22 Feb 2013, at 18:18, Alan Greenberg wrote:

> To kick off the discussion, Since a large number of our group will be 
> in Beijing, I don't think that we can afford not to meet there. We 
> are starting far later than originally planned, but still trying to 
> make the original deadline of 31-Dec. I think a 2nd face-to-face 
> meeting near the start of our work is valuable, so it is either 
> Beijing, or moving the entire group to somewhere else very close (in 
> time) to the Beijing meeting.
> If we are looking for two days (which seems reasonable to me), there 
> seem to be several potential options from the two days preceding the 
> start of many meetings (Fri Apr 4, Sat Apr 5) and the three days 
> after (Fri Apr 12, Sat Apr 13, Sun Apr 14). Note that some of us are 
> scheduled for other meetings on Sat, Apr 5 (I am), but probably not 
> enough to rule out that day.
> If we were to meet only after the ICANN week, my inclination would be 
> to make it Sat-Sun to give people just a bit of time to clear their 
> minds and get ready.
> So the options seems to be:
> a) 4, 5 (Before)
> b) 12, 13 (After with no break)
> c) 13, 14 (After with a break)
> d) 5, 12 (Split with no break)
> e) 5, 13 (Split with a break)
> I can live with any of these options but have a preference for a or c.
> Alan
> _______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2

More information about the atrt2 mailing list