[atrt2] Preliminary report - Call 22 Feb 2013
Brian Cute
bcute at pir.org
Fri Feb 22 23:39:18 UTC 2013
David,
It seemed to work well. And I meant to say "a summary of closed sessions..."
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:30 PM, "David Conrad" <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
> Brian,
>
> On Feb 22, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Brian Cute <brianacute at gmail.com> wrote:
>> As a point of reference, ATRT1 established a rule of open and transparent meetings and work. The Team established the possibility of "closed session" with Chatham House Rule if necessary but to also provide a summary or closed sessions for the community/public.
>
> That seems eminently reasonable. Were there any negative repercussions that the first ATRT experienced that would suggest we not follow this rule with ATRT2?
>
> Thanks,
> -drc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
More information about the atrt2
mailing list