[atrt2] Preliminary report - Call 22 Feb 2013
bcute at pir.org
Fri Feb 22 23:39:18 UTC 2013
It seemed to work well. And I meant to say "a summary of closed sessions..."
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:30 PM, "David Conrad" <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Brian Cute <brianacute at gmail.com> wrote:
>> As a point of reference, ATRT1 established a rule of open and transparent meetings and work. The Team established the possibility of "closed session" with Chatham House Rule if necessary but to also provide a summary or closed sessions for the community/public.
> That seems eminently reasonable. Were there any negative repercussions that the first ATRT experienced that would suggest we not follow this rule with ATRT2?
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
More information about the atrt2