[atrt2] [atrt2-coordination] Demi's recommended edits

[Alan Greenberg]

Forgot to add:

Staff is coordinating the following distribution to take place on 
Monday 1 July by end of business:
- Direct emails to the firms that responded to ATRT 1 RFP
- Posting on the ICANN web site
- Press release for broad distribution

The list of ATRT1 bidders can be found at 
<http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/atrt/rfp-respondents-evaluation-19jun10-en.pdf>http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/atrt/rfp-respondents-evaluation-19jun10-en.pdf.

The scoring system used by ATRT for their Independant Expert can be 
found at 
http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/atrt/proposals-evaluation-scoring-sheet-19jun10-en.pdf. 
We will quickly need to put one together for our evaluation of RFP repsonses.

Alan




At 30/06/2013 10:38 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>Thanks to Avri for incorporating the suggestions to date. I think 
>that all have been included except for Demi's last suggestion of 
>adding the task of identifying comparable MS processes. I tried 
>adding that, but it made for a very awkward sentence, and it is 
>already implied, since the comparison cannot be done without first 
>identifying what to compare to (thanks to Avri for pointing that out).
>
>I did some punctuation cleanup, and have one other suggestion for a 
>change, removing the word "encouraging" from "...whether the PDP 
>process could be strengthened by encouraging the submission of views 
>and advice from the GAC whether the PDP process could be 
>strengthened by encouraging the submission of views and advice from 
>the GAC..." since it is not the encouraging that would not change 
>anything, but the actual submission. That change is redlined in the 
>version attached.
>
>Larisa has also made some administrative changes.
>
>Unless I hear anything further (about that last changes or anything 
>else in the RFP), I will send give staff the go-ahead to issue the 
>RFP at 16:00 UTC on Monday (9 am PST and 2 hours after the end of 
>our call with the CSG).
>
>Alan
>
>At 30/06/2013 05:51 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>I move one bullet, but could not come up with wording for his 
>>Identify clause.
>>Seems like one would have to identify them before benchmarking against them.
>>
>>avri
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On 30 Jun 2013, at 12:41, Avri Doria wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Anyone want to take them on?
>> >
>> > If so, may I pass the editor token to you?
>> >
>> > avri
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > atrt2-coordination mailing list
>> > atrt2-coordination at icann.org
>> > 
>> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2-coordination>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2-coordination
>> >
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>atrt2-coordination mailing list
>>atrt2-coordination at icann.org
>><https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2-coordination>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2-coordination 
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>atrt2 mailing list
>atrt2 at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt2/attachments/20130630/7ce44450/attachment.html>