[bc-gnso] PEDNAR (post expiration domain name recovery) PDP needs a constituency statement from us

[Marilyn Cade]

as a very very very small domain name holder -- I used to hold 3, and now, due to co organizing the IGF USA, I have had to up my portfolio by 6 more names for defensive purposes for a very worthwhile voluntary effort, but it has 'quadrupled' the names I need to care about, and I would indeed care if one of them expired and I didn't have a way to 'salvage' it.  So, I do appreciate the work of the BC members on this. I suspect that businesses with large portfoiios of defensive registrations do as well.
Marilyn 




> CC: bc-gnso at icann.org
> From: mike at haven2.com
> To: michael at palage.com
> Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] PEDNAR (post expiration domain name recovery) PDP needs a constituency statement from us
> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:03:10 -0500
> 
> 
> just a process update, we're just wrapping up the PEDNAR call right  
> now and it looks like only 2 constituencies got statements in on  
> time.  so we all have a 2-week "dog ate the homework" extension.
> 
> Berry Cobb is pulling together a call among the BC members on the  
> PEDNAR working group (Berry, Mike, Phil Corwin, me) to hammer on this  
> and figure out a process to get something by you for review.  Palage  
> is off to a great start with this post.
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Michael D. Palage wrote:
> 
> >
> > Philip/Mike R,
> >
> > In the interest of preserving the BC position on this topic, I can  
> > also
> > report that the registry constituency will be submitting a comment  
> > after the
> > close of the formal comment period. Therefore, if we did submit a late
> > response we would not be alone.
> >
> > I would like to submit the following statement for consideration to  
> > the
> > group, friendly amendments welcomed.
> >
> > While the Business Constituency supports competition and innovation  
> > within
> > the marketplace, these principles should not compromise the rights of
> > registrants with regard to open, transparent and predicable practices
> > concerning expiring domain names. The Business Constituency would  
> > like to
> > thank ICANN staff for their support of the PEDNR Working Group to  
> > date. Two
> > staff members that have provided critical support to date are Marika
> > Konings, who will be overseeing a registrar survey to provide a more
> > accurate picture of the expiring domain name market and William  
> > McKelligott,
> > an Auditor from the ICANN Contractual Compliance Team, for his work in
> > accessing registrar compliance with regard to the Expired Domain  
> > Deletion
> > Policy (EDDP).
> >
> > While the BC will await these survey results and other additional fact
> > finding prior to formulating a more detailed position statement,  
> > there is
> > one important point that the BC would like to make at this time in
> > connection with the accuracy of Whois data. The BC has long  
> > advocated in
> > support of increased accuracy of whois data. The preliminary work of  
> > the
> > Work Group appears to indicate that registrar practices in  
> > connection with
> > the transfer of domain names post expiration may result in  
> > inaccurate whois
> > data that may materially impact a trademark owners right to enforce  
> > their
> > rights through the UDRP.
> >
> > The BC apologizes for the untimely submission of this comment, but its
> > members and leadership look forward to meaningfully participating in  
> > the
> > upcoming forum at the ICANN annual meeting in Seoul.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On  
> > Behalf Of
> > Philip Sheppard
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 8:41 AM
> > To: 'BC gnso'
> > Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] PEDNAR (post expiration domain name recovery)  
> > PDP
> > needs a constituency statement from us
> >
> >
> > Michael,
> > you are I agree.
> > I believe it IS an issue but regret the inaction to date by other BC
> > members.
> >
> > Why could you not have spent the time writing your last e-mail by  
> > drafting a
> > BC
> > position?
> >
> > Philip
> >
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 	651-647-6109
> fax  		866-280-2356
> web 	www.haven2.com
> handle	OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,  
> Google, etc.)
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20090922/c792482d/attachment.html>