[bc-gnso] ICANN staff exodus
pcorwin at butera-andrews.com
Mon Jul 19 14:40:32 UTC 2010
Agree that it is not appropriate to mention staff changes in the DAG comment letter.
Has ICANN really lost "much of its senior management team"? I know that Brent and Giza are leaving, but are there others? In any event, unless there's an epidemic of such departures, and unless we know the specific reasons for them, it is inappropriate to assert that they indicate problems with the new CEO -- in fact, my experience is that most large organizations see some significant staff turnover in the year after a new CEO comes on board.
Philip S. Corwin
Butera & Andrews
1301 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20004
"Luck is the residue of design." -- Branch Rickey
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] on behalf of Philip Sheppard [philip.sheppard at aim.be]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 4:17 AM
To: bc-GNSO at icann.org
Subject: [bc-gnso] ICANN staff exodus
I support NOT commenting in our proposed paper on DAG4 paper on the recent staff exodus.
An organisation that loses much of its senior management team within months of the arrival of a new CEO is an organisation within which something is wrong.
I suggest the BC ex comm discuss whether they believe the BC should make a general comment or perhaps a letter on this issue (or maybe a letter just on compliance).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bc-gnso