[cc-humanrights] Human Rights and ICANN - session description

Stephanie Perrin stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
Fri Dec 5 17:39:36 UTC 2014


I am reluctant to turn Monday into pure circus.  Nothing wrong with 
Monday afternoon.  We will have substance....
cheers Steph
On 2014-12-05, 9:39, Marilia Maciel wrote:
> Yes, I meant Wednesday. Thanks for the correction Niels. Although 
> Olivier mentioned that Monday afternoon is not blocked..
>
> Considering the meeting will always clash with something else, a 
> 3-hour session could be strategic to allow people to join us at some 
> moment. We could even explicitly divide the session in "part 1" and 
> "part 2", so people that could come (although late) do not feel they 
> missed too much and still feel encouraged to attend. Of course, this 
> is besides the fact that we do have a lot of substantive topics to 
> discuss. I understand Rafik´s point, but maybe we should try to push 
> for the three hours.
>
> Rafik, do you suggest we wait to book the room, so we coordinate with 
> other sessions being scheduled? Isn´t it dangerous in terms of 
> securing a room for us? I think it is better to have it scheduled as 
> soon as possible. If something substantial changes on the agenda we 
> re-evaluate.
>
> Best,
>
> Marília
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com 
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi ,
>
>     I think we should see the different SO/AC  sessions ( we have also
>     the CCWG on IG session too!) and find some possible time slot.
>
>     3 hours is long and not necessarily easy to secure room (while we
>     could do that in London for a different topic , not sure we can
>     reiterate that).
>
>     Rafik
>
>     2014-12-05 22:59 GMT+09:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com
>     <mailto:ocl at gih.com>>:
>
>         Hello all,
>
>         it is possible to program for Monday afternoon. They frown
>         upon it because that takes people out of the main room but the
>         ALAC and other WGs have staged meetings on Monday afternoon
>         with little interference. One of the problems is that by
>         killing Fridays the week has become shorter and with the
>         Thursday circus Thursday is now dead. With Monday risking
>         being filled by the circus too we have Tuesday which is
>         impossible due to Constituency day. But guess what, I'm now
>         told some parts of Constituency day might happen on Wednesday
>         morning too. So Wednesday afternoon? Oh now, that's GNSO wrap up.
>         <sigh>
>
>         Olivier
>
>
>         On 05/12/2014 14:41, William Drake wrote:
>         > you can't program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff
>         they think is more important.
>         >
>         > I'd ask for Wednesday morning.
>         >
>         > BD
>         >
>         >> On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever
>         <niels at article19.org> <mailto:niels at article19.org> wrote:
>         >>
>>         Hi Rafik,
>>
>>         You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled
>>         out. Can
>>         we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
>>
>>         I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour
>>         meeting, so let's go for that.
>>
>>         Best,
>>
>>         Niels
>>
>>
>>         Niels ten Oever
>>         Head of Digital
>>
>>         Article 19
>>         www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
>>
>>         PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2
>>         636D 68E9
>>
>>         On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>         >>> Hi Niels,
>>         >>>
>>         >>> Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting
>>         and we had
>>         >>> such conflict last time.
>>         >>>
>>         >>> Rafik
>>         >>>
>>         >>> 2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever
>>         <niels at article19.org <mailto:niels at article19.org>
>>         >>> <mailto:niels at article19.org> <mailto:niels at article19.org>>:
>>         >>>
>>         >>>
>>         >>> On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
>>         >>>> Hi Niels,
>>         >>>
>>         >>>
>>         >>> Hi Rafik,
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> I am not senior within ICANN
>>         >>>
>>         >>> Well, at least more senior than me ;)
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> but I guess I can help for this.
>>         >>>
>>         >>> That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on
>>         Wednesday
>>         >>> afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would
>>         suffice.
>>         >>> Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I
>>         know we
>>         >>> could easily fill it).
>>         >>>
>>         >>> What do you people think?
>>         >>>
>>         >>> Best,
>>         >>>
>>         >>> Niels
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> Rafik
>>         >>>
>>         >>>
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever
>>         <niels at article19.org <mailto:niels at article19.org>
>>         >>>> <mailto:niels at article19.org>
>>         <mailto:niels at article19.org>> a écrit :
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> Hi all,
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> It seems there is consensus about the text for the
>>         session at
>>         >>>> ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All
>>         >>>> comments are very welcome.
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> _________
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> There is a growing recognition in parts of the community
>>         that
>>         >>>> some of ICANN's policies and other actions may have
>>         implications
>>         >>>> for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to
>>         >>>> privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such
>>         >>>> rights, it would be advisable on political and other
>>         grounds to
>>         >>>> assess whether our work is fully consistent with
>>         internationally
>>         >>>> agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify
>>         possible
>>         >>>> methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case
>>         >>>> basis. This cross-community workshop will consider
>>         options for
>>         >>>> starting a process that could address them in a more
>>         systemic
>>         >>>> manner.
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> ________
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> What would be the process to request the room? I would
>>         be happy
>>         >>>> to send some emails, but given the experiences during
>>         last ICANN
>>         >>>> meeting it might be more effective if someone more
>>         senior in the
>>         >>>> ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> Thanks in advance,
>>         >>>
>>         >>>> Niels
>>         >>>
>>         >>>
>>         >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>         cc-humanrights
>>         >>>>> mailing listcc-humanrights at icann.org
>>         <mailto:listcc-humanrights at icann.org>
>>         >>>>> <mailto:cc-humanrights at icann.org>
>>         <mailto:cc-humanrights at icann.org>
>>         >>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>>         >>>
>>         >>>
>>         >>>
>         >> _______________________________________________
>         >> cc-humanrights mailing list
>         >> cc-humanrights at icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights at icann.org>
>         >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>         >
>         > ***********************************************
>         > William J. Drake
>         > International Fellow & Lecturer
>         >   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>         >   University of Zurich, Switzerland
>         > Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>         >   ICANN, www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org>
>         > william.drake at uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch> (direct),
>         wjdrake at gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com> (lists),
>         > www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org>
>         > ***********************************************
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > cc-humanrights mailing list
>         > cc-humanrights at icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights at icann.org>
>         > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>         >
>
>         -- 
>         Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
>         http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         cc-humanrights mailing list
>         cc-humanrights at icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights at icann.org>
>         https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     cc-humanrights mailing list
>     cc-humanrights at icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> *Marília Maciel*
> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law 
> School
> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>
> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu <http://www.diplomacy.edu>
> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
> Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - 
> http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-humanrights mailing list
> cc-humanrights at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cc-humanrights/attachments/20141205/5fd31a31/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the cc-humanrights mailing list