[cc-humanrights] last call - infographic ICANN & Human Rights

[Marilia Maciel]

Hi Niels and all,

Congratulations to Niels and the team working on the visualisation. It is a
great work and I find the infographic extremely informative. I have just a
few observations:

- The line that goes from the UDHR to second generation and then to
particular instruments is not clear, because some of the instruments, like
the ICCPR are part of the first generation of HR, while the ICESCR is
indeed document that consolidates second generation rights. We need a
different breakout if we want to speak of the generations.
- On the human rights principles section, maybe it would be useful to
mention the distinction from the responsibility to protect and respect,
which is something mentioned in several occasions in our discussions in
ICANN.
- Glossary: a) In INGOs there is a space missing and a typo in the word
organisation. b) Add " DANE"  to the glossary. c) Put the glossary in
alphabetic order.
- FoE stream: --> new gTLD program --> new gTLD subsequent round (WG). The
WG is looking at a wide scope of issues, not only FoE and the title of the
WG (new gTLD subsequent round) in column 3 is not explanatory of any
particular FoE issue.
- A suggestion came from CoE in the last ICANN meeting that we should
rearrange the order in which we list the rights, maybe mirroring the order
that they appear in the UDHR. I think it is a valuable suggestion. In any
case, I would not start the list with due process, maybe it is good to
start with a human right that is more widely " accepted" and understood in
the ICANN space.
- Some of the ICANN policies of processes are actually active WGs. When
this is the case, it would be good to indicate that clearly ex: new gTLD
subsequent procedures WG, Rights protection mechanisms in all gTLDs WG,
etc...

Reacting to Kathy's suggestion, I believe we should strictly follow the
name of the policy or WG we are talking about. So, yes, if they have
"Review"  in the title, I would retain this word. But I would not add words
like "balanced" if they are not in the official title.

Once again, great job and looking forward to the discussion on the
visualisation in Helsinki!

Best wishes,
Marilia

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
wrote:

> Hi Niels and All,
>
> The Rights Protection Mechanism listing seem a little more directive than
> the other phrases -- and could be read to urge specific positions rather
> than just listing the ICANN proceedings that are looking at the issues.
> Can we be a bit more neutral in our phrasing? I would recommend:
>
> - Review of appropriate protections for IGOs/INGOs in gTLDs
>
> - Review of balanced curative rights protections in IGO/INGOs in gTLDs
>
> - Review of all rights protection mechanisms currently in gTLDs
>
> - Review of balanced rights protection mechanisms for future new gTLD
> rounds
>
> This will avoid misinterpretation... tx you!
> Best regards, Kathy
>
> On 6/7/2016 9:49 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have integrated your comments and suggestions as well as I could and I
> think we have a very nice info-graphic right now that we can present in
> Helsinki.
>
> So I would like to do a last call to see whether you all can live with this.
>
> Of course this will remain a working document, but it would be great if
> we can show this in Helsinki as work of the CCWP HR.
>
> Looking forward to hear your comments, questions and/or suggestions.
>
> Best,
>
> Niels
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-humanrights mailing listcc-humanrights at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-humanrights mailing list
> cc-humanrights at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cc-humanrights/attachments/20160610/7a36e7a4/attachment.html>