[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For final review - proposed CCWG Final Report, indicative poll results and public comment announcement

[Marika Konings]

Sending on behalf of the CCWG Co-Chairs

Dear all,

Thank you for those who participated in the indicative poll and those who submitted comments on the most recent draft of the proposed Final Report. Attached please find the results of the indicative poll. As summarized in the spreadsheet, fourteen members out of twenty-three members responded. In addition, eight participants provided their input.

In response to the question “Are you of the view that the CCWG should only recommend one mechanism for ICANN Board consideration, even if your preferred mechanism does not come out as the preferred mechanism of the CCWG overall?”, six members indicated their preference to recommend the top two ranked mechanisms to the ICANN Board, five members indicated their preference to only recommend 1 mechanism, two members indicated their preference to recommend all three mechanism and one member indicated no preference.

In response to the ranking, seven members recommended mechanism A as their preferred mechanism, four members ranked mechanism B as their preferred mechanism and three members ranked mechanism C first.

After reviewing these results, the leadership team believes that the best path forward is to recommend mechanism A and mechanism B in the proposed Final Report, but the leadership team is not discarding mechanism C (an ICANN Foundation) yet. The attached revision to the proposed Final Report includes updates based on the most recent round of comments from members, as well as revisions in line with the leadership team’s suggested approach regarding the mechanisms. Note that the report includes the following text: “As a number of members did not participate in the indicative survey it is possible that the outcome could change as a result of further deliberations, consideration of input received and consultations by the members with their respective appointing organizations.”

The leadership team proposes that the CCWG review the poll results, suggested approach, and report revisions by the end of this week (Friday 20 December) and that we open the public comment forum on Monday 23 December (see proposed announcement attached).

Thanks in advance for your review.

Kind regards,
Erika and Ching

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20191218/85d0c181/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: new gTLD AP CCWG Draft Final Report - version 17 December 2019.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 169530 bytes
Desc: new gTLD AP CCWG Draft Final Report - version 17 December 2019.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20191218/85d0c181/newgTLDAPCCWGDraftFinalReport-version17December2019-0001.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Copy of CCWG indicative poll results - final.xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 14318 bytes
Desc: Copy of CCWG indicative poll results - final.xlsx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20191218/85d0c181/CopyofCCWGindicativepollresults-final-0001.xlsx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Public Comment Proceeding template - Proposed Final Report - updated 17 December 2019.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 35128 bytes
Desc: Public Comment Proceeding template - Proposed Final Report - updated 17 December 2019.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20191218/85d0c181/PublicCommentProceedingtemplate-ProposedFinalReport-updated17December2019-0001.docx>