[CWG-DT-Stewardship] Question of Names only group?

[Burr, Becky]

I haven¹t heard that anyone refused to participate.  I think the
expectation is that the numbers and protocols folks are running their own
parallel processes.

J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  /
becky.burr at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz






On 7/14/14, 4:32 PM, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>hi,
>
>I was new to the group today and that seemed to be a decsion that had
>already been made.  But I don't understand it.
>
>Has the ASO refused to participate?  Since the NRO and the ASO each have
>representatives, I am assuming that they are not one and the same.  So
>perhaps there are issues of ICANN's relationship to this whole thing
>that they may be interested in.
>
>It does not seem reasonable to me to give up the idea of a CCWG that
>works on the entire ICANN aspect of the transition and that includes at
>least possibly, all ACSO.  I tend to think there may be issues that are
>larger than just names among the ICANN aspects of this transition.
>
>But of course if the ASO and others have all said, no, no way, not even
>interested in looking at your charter, then ok.  Otherwise, I would like
>to understand better.
>
>thanks
>
>avri
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list
>CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://mm.icann.org/mailman/li
>stinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship&k=lQ50IrZ4n2wmPbDBDzKBYw%3D%3D%0A&r=1J%2BU11wfJS
>XOLgU2NzyyPtxJzuvGV4bYQHowOGDBoZw%3D%0A&m=gEjwjvZb3tB8hBp8oqF39jGnyWY%2Bju
>mBBpiURUU7%2Fj0%3D%0A&s=9d292571c7dc07aaecd7faad77373c8296600fb3ab95d74b79
>37d58de2b37edd