[CWG-DT-Stewardship] For your review - Charter Template

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I remain uncomfortable with a scope that restricts the CWG from
addressing issue 1 & 10, even though I realize they are not the primary
task.

I understand that people do not think it appropriate for ICANN policy
participants to give recommendations on anything but names, but since
ICANN's scope is broader than that I do not think we should define
having a viewpoint on non names subjects as out of scope.

It we want we can perhaps indicate that the primary task are 2-9 & 11,
but the CWG should be able to comment on anything that the CG does
without fear of being called out of scope.

Also, I still argue that there will be cross-cutting issues - such as
the accountability linkages that won't be strictly put into the silos
everyone seems to be agreeing to.  I find it ironic that we are being so
strict about silos.

Who is handling .int - is it an orphan issue?

Can we find someway to have both a primary work task and a commenting
scope wide enough to pick up anything that needs to be commented on.

Also, how are the non ccNSO cctLDs being handled in this process? Do we
plan to reach out to them for participation?  Should something specific
be said about that in the charter?

In general I worry about limiting participation to members of the
chartering organization in this group.  Since any output need to be
approved by the chartering organizations anyway, perhaps the group
should be open.


thanks

avri


On 16-Jul-14 17:25, Allan MacGillivray wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
>  
> 
> I developed some text around problem statement, goals and objectives as
> well as scope which I have included in Marika’s draft.  Rather than
> including a number of options on these important issues, I tried to be
> as specific as possible on what I think the important issues are in the
> hope of provoking an early discussion on these key aspects.  The text
> references an Annex listing the IANA functions, which is based on the
> actual IANA/NTIA contract, as summarized by Becky.  I am including this
> as a separate attachment.  We can talk about this on Monday but if there
> are any questions of clarification or comment before then please ping me.
> 
>  
> 
> Allan  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> *From:*cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Marika Konings
> *Sent:* July-16-14 6:45 AM
> *To:* CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-DT-Stewardship] For your review - Charter Template
> 
>  
> 
> Dear All,
> 
>  
> 
> Following our call on Monday, please find attached a first draft of the
> charter template for your review. Please note that Allan volunteered to
> provide some draft language for the first three sections (problem
> statement, goals & objectives, scope) which we'll insert as soon as
> available. However, to already allow you some time to review some of the
> other sections which, as discussed, have been populated with language
> from the initial draft as well as the charter of the Cross-Community
> Working Group on principles for CWGs, we already wanted to circulate
> this version now. Note that I've taken the liberty to insert some
> comments in areas where the DT will need to make some further
> determinations, provided there is support for the draft language
> provided. You are encouraged to share any comments / proposed edits you
> may have ahead of Monday's meeting.
> 
>  
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Marika
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship
>