[Cwg-framework-principles] Proposed timeline and updated draft Framework of Principles document

[Mary Wong]

Hello Jim and everyone,

Thanks so much for the comments and support - we’ll be sure to incorporate your suggestion about a periodic review into the draft Framework. As you’ll all have seen, the co-chairs have decided that the CWG call originally scheduled for tomorrow should be canceled, seeing as no other comments that might require further deliberations have been received.

As such, staff will proceed to update the draft Framework document and publish it for public comment according to the timetable we have noted previously. Concurrently we will circulate the draft to all SO/AC chairs to invite them and their communities to comment. The timing will also allow us to conduct a community session at ICANN55 to gather feedback and share our preliminary recommendations, following which we can reconvene as a group to discuss community input provided in Marrakech and through the public comment forum.

Thanks and cheers
Mary


Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong at icann.org
Telephone: +1-603-5744889









On 2/10/16, 03:10, "James Galvin" <jgalvin at afilias.info> wrote:

>I have reviewed this document and am fine with all changes shown.  With 
>respect to the non-editorial comments and questions I offer the 
>following.
>
>1. I agree with the addition of Step 5, “Post-Closure of CCWG”.
>
>2. I also agree that we should probably add a section for “Data and 
>Metrics” as suggested.  We do reference the use of data and metric a 
>few times in the document so I think this would be helpful.  I don’t 
>have a suggestion for text and so I’m also going to say I’m fine 
>with this going forward as is if no one else is able to put forth a 
>suggestion.
>
>One last suggestion I would make is perhaps we should suggest in the 
>conclusions that this document should be reviewed and considered for 
>revision in 3 years or after 3 CCWGs have completed, whichever is later.
>
>Jim
>
>
>
>
>On 26 Jan 2016, at 13:50, Mary Wong wrote:
>
>> Dear CWG members,
>>
>> To follow up on the call that was held last week, here is the amended 
>> timeline that was discussed; you’ll see that we have allowed for one 
>> additional CWG call (on 11 February) as well as an open community 
>> session during ICANN55 in Marrakech, which will be during the public 
>> comment period we hope to open for our Framework document.
>>
>> 21 January – CWG call to discuss any concerns/comments about the 
>> updated draft Framework document
>> 5 February – deadline for final CWG comments
>> 11 February – CWG call to discuss additional concerns raised between 
>> 21 January and 5 February
>> 19 February – publication of Framework document for public comment, 
>> for the prescribed 40 day period (unless the CWG or the ccNSO or GNSO 
>> Councils request an extension); document will also be sent to all 
>> other ICANN SO/ACs to alert them to the proposed recommendations and 
>> to seek feedback
>> 6-10 March – ICANN55 (schedule a community session to present and 
>> discuss community feedback on the Framework document)
>> 30 March – close of public comment period; Framework to be updated 
>> if necessary based on public comments received
>> Mid-April – updated Framework document sent to CWG for final 
>> approval
>> End-April – final Framework document sent to ccNSO and GNSO Councils 
>> (the Chartering Organizations for our CWG)
>> May/June – consideration and adoption of Framework by ccNSO and GNSO 
>> Councils
>>
>> For your convenience, the draft Framework document is appended to this 
>> email. Besides cleaning up some formatting, grammatical and 
>> typographical errors, we have also added language in a few places in 
>> Section 3 to reflect the discussion on the CWG call last week – 
>> these additions can be seen as “redlined” markup text in the 
>> attachment.
>>
>> Please also note that Section 4 contains a number of open questions 
>> for which your feedback will be helpful. You may also, as a CWG, 
>> decide to seek public comment on some of these questions as well.
>>
>> We will send around call-in details for the proposed CWG call on 11 
>> February shortly.
>>
>> Thanks and cheers
>> Mary
>>
>>
>> Mary Wong
>> Senior Policy Director
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>> Telephone: +1-603-5744889
>>
>>
>> From: 
>> <cwg-framework-principles-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-framework-principles-bounces at icann.org>> 
>> on behalf of Steve Chan 
>> <steve.chan at icann.org<mailto:steve.chan at icann.org>>
>> Date: Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 12:32
>> To: 
>> "cwg-framework-principles at icann.org<mailto:cwg-framework-principles at icann.org>" 
>> <cwg-framework-principles at icann.org<mailto:cwg-framework-principles at icann.org>>
>> Subject: [Cwg-framework-principles] - Proposed Agenda
>>
>> Dear CWG Members,
>>
>> Apologies for the late delivery, but below, please find the proposed 
>> agenda for the meeting scheduled for 15:00 UTC on 21 January 2016. In 
>> addition, attached, please find the draft framework that staff already 
>> circulated on 21 December 2015, which will serve as the central point 
>> of discussion for this call.
>>
>> *   Roll Call/SOIs
>> *   Discussion of Circulated Draft Framework
>> *   Next Steps
>>
>> I look forward to speaking with those that can attend the call.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>>
>> Steven Chan
>> Sr. Policy Manager
>>
>> ICANN
>> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
>> steve.chan at icann.org
>> <mailto:steve.chan at icann.org>
>> direct: +1.310.301.3886
>> mobile: +1.310.339.4410
>> tel: +1.310.301.5800
>> fax: +1.310.823.8649
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cwg-framework-principles mailing list
>> Cwg-framework-principles at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-framework-principles